Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31221983›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Integration of expert knowledge in the definition of Swiss pear core collection.

J Urrestarazu, C Kägi, A Bühlmann, J Gassmann, L G Santesteban, J E Frey, M Kellerhals, C Miranda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The MultisitePlant physiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J UrrestarazuDepartment of Agronomy, Biotechnology and Food Science, Public University of Navarre, 31006, Pamplona, Spain. jorge.urrestarazu@unavarra.es.
C KägiFederal Office for Agriculture, 3003, Bern, Switzerland.
A BühlmannAgroscope, 8820, Wädenswil, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8255-3228
J GassmannAgroscope, 8820, Wädenswil, Switzerland.
L G SantestebanDepartment of Agronomy, Biotechnology and Food Science, Public University of Navarre, 31006, Pamplona, Spain.
J E FreyAgroscope, 8820, Wädenswil, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7377-2931
M KellerhalsAgroscope, 8820, Wädenswil, Switzerland.
C MirandaDepartment of Agronomy, Biotechnology and Food Science, Public University of Navarre, 31006, Pamplona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Core collections (CCs) constitute a key tool for the characterization and management of genetic resources (GR). When the institutions involved in GR preservation decide to define a CC, they frequently prefer to select accessions based not only on strictly objective criteria, but also to add others following expert knowledge considerations (popularity, prestige, role in breeding history, or presence of phenotypic features of interest). The aim of this study was to evaluate the implications of approaches that combine formal analytical procedures and expert knowledge on the efficiency of CC definition through a case study to establish a pear CC from the Swiss National Pear Inventory. The CC had to represent a maximum of the genetic diversity, not to exceed 150 accessions, and required to include a priority set (SPPS) with 86 genotypes selected based on expert knowledge. In total, nine strategies were evaluated, resulting of combining compositions of the dataset sampled, sampling sizes and methods. The CCs sampled by mixed approaches provided similar scores, irrespective of the approach considered, and obtained similar efficiency in optimizing the genetic diversity retained. Therefore, mixed approaches can be an appropriate choice for applications involving genetic conservation in tree germplasm collections.

Indexed as

Genes, PlantGenetic MarkersGenotypePlant BreedingPyrusSwitzerlandGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID31221983
PMCPMC6586639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.