Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31221888›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Protocol for a randomised, single-blind, two-arm, parallel-group controlled trial of the efficacy of rhinothermy delivered by nasal high flow therapy in the treatment of the common cold.

Grace Bird, Irene Braithwaite, James Harper, Steven McKinstry, Iris Koorevaar, James Fingleton, Alex Semprini, Meik Dilcher, Lance Jennings, Mark Weatherall and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Grace BirdMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3761-2778
Irene BraithwaiteMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5327-3027
James HarperMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Steven McKinstryMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Iris KoorevaarMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
James FingletonMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Alex SempriniMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0949-0555
Meik DilcherCanterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Lance JenningsCanterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Mark WeatherallDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Richard BeasleyMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand · NZCanterbury Health Laboratories · NZUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe common cold is the most common infectious disease affecting humans. It is usually a self-limiting disease; however, the common cold can cause significant morbidity and has a substantial economic impact on society. Human rhinoviruses (HRVs), which cause up to two-thirds of colds, have temperature-dependent replication and most HRV strains replicate optimally at 33°C. Delivery of heated, humidified air to the upper airways has the potential to reduce viral replication, but evidence of the effectiveness of this treatment of the common cold is inconclusive. We plan to test the hypothesis that delivery of humidified air heated to 41°C at high flow, nasal high flow rhinothermy (rNHF), for 2 hours daily for five days is more effective in reducing common cold symptom severity and duration than five days of 'sham' rhinothermy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a randomised, single-blind, parallel-group trial comparing rNHF to 'sham' rhinothermy in the treatment of common cold. We plan to recruit 170 participants within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms of common cold and randomise them 1:1 to receive one of the two treatments for five days. The study duration is 14 days, which includes clinic visits on the first day of randomisation and four days post-randomisation, and a phone call on the 14th day. Participants will complete daily symptom diaries which include a symptom score, the Modified Jackson Score (MJS). The primary outcome is the MJS after four days. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: New Zealand Ethics Registration: 17/STH/174. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal, presented at academic meetings, and reported to participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: U1111-1194-4345 and ACTRN12617001340325; Pre-results.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAirCommon ColdHumansHumidityHyperthermia, InducedMiddle AgedNoseRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory TherapySingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultinfectious diseasesinternal medicinerespiratory infections

Identifiers

PMID31221888
PMCPMC6589000
OpenAlexW2949618002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.