Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31221882›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Different potencies of topical corticosteroids for a better treatment strategy in children with atopic dermatitis (the Rotterdam Eczema study): protocol for an observational cohort study with an embedded randomised open-label controlled trial.

Karlijn F van Halewijn, Arthur M Bohnen, Pieter J van den Berg, Suzanne G M A Pasmans, Patrick J E Bindels, Gijs Elshout

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Topical anti-inflammatory treatments for eczema: network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Defining "Flares" in Atopic Dermatitis: A Narrative Review.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2025
    Review
  5. Neutrophils in Atopic Dermatitis.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2024
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karlijn F van HalewijnDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Arthur M BohnenDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pieter J van den BergDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Suzanne G M A PasmansDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Patrick J E BindelsDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gijs ElshoutDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTopical corticosteroids (TCS) of different potencies are the main treatment to control atopic dermatitis (AD). The Dutch guideline on AD for general practitioners (GPs) recommends a stepwise approach in which treatment steps are tailored to the severity of the disease, starting with the lowest possible potency of TCS. However, it remains unclear whether the recommended stepwise approach is most efficient. This randomised open-label controlled trial aims to determine whether a potent TCS is more effective than a low-potency TCS in the initial treatment of children with a moderate flare-up of AD in primary care. In the observational cohort, the overall aim is to determine the frequency, burden and determinants of flare-ups of AD during follow-up. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is an observational cohort study with an embedded pragmatic randomised controlled, open-label trial. Eligible are patients diagnosed with AD (aged 12 weeks to 18 years) who visited the GP for AD or received repeated prescriptions for AD in the previous 12 months; follow-up of the cohort is 1 year. Children are enrolled in the trial if they have a flare-up of AD during follow-up in the cohort. Eligible children are randomised to the intervention group (with a potent TCS once daily) or to the GP guideline group (with a low potency TCS once daily). Primary outcome is the difference in average subjective disease severity over 24 weeks follow-up in the trial, measured with the patient-oriented eczema measure. As secondary outcome, the Eczema Area and Severity Index is measured. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study tests the hypothesis that immediate treatment with a potent TCS during a flare-up of AD leads to faster and more efficacious results as compared with starting with a TCS with low potency with less overall use of TCS. The study protocol is approved by the Medical Ethics Committee (MEC) of the Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands (MEC-2017-328). The results of the study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR: 6679; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAdolescentAdrenal Cortex HormonesChildChild, PreschoolDermatitis, AtopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansInfantObservational Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAdrenal Cortex Hormonesatopic dermatitiscohortpaediatricsPrimary carerandomised open-label controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID31221882
PMCPMC6588953
OpenAlexW2950521009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.