Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31221873›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Impact of the implementation of a fast-track on emergency department length of stay and quality of care indicators in the Champagne-Ardenne region: a before-after study.

Jan Chrusciel, Xavier Fontaine, Arnaud Devillard, Aurélien Cordonnier, Lukshe Kanagaratnam, David Laplanche, Stéphane Sanchez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Clinical Effect of Nursing Based on the Kano Model in Emergency Multiple Injuries.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jan ChruscielDepartment of Medical Information and Performance Evaluation, Centre Hospitalier de Troyes, Troyes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8364-6506
Xavier FontaineEmergency Department, Manchester Hospital, Charleville-Mézières, France.
Arnaud DevillardEmergency Department, Centre Hospitalier de Troyes, Troyes, France.
Aurélien CordonnierDepartment of Medical Information, Manchester Hospital, Charleville-Mézières, France.
Lukshe KanagaratnamDepartment of Research and Public Health, University Hospitals of Reims, Reims, France.
David LaplancheDepartment of Medical Information and Performance Evaluation, Centre Hospitalier de Troyes, Troyes, France.
Stéphane SanchezDepartment of Medical Information and Performance Evaluation, Centre Hospitalier de Troyes, Troyes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0925-6948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to evaluate the effect of the implementation of a fast-track on emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) and quality of care indicators.

designAdjusted before-after analysis.

settingA large hospital in the Champagne-Ardenne region, France.

participantsPatients admitted to the ED between 13 January 2015 and 13 January 2017.

interventionImplementation of a fast-track for patients with small injuries or benign medical conditions (13 January 2016). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients with LOS ≥4 hours and proportion of access block situations (when patients cannot access an appropriate hospital bed within 8 hours). 7-day readmissions and 30-day readmissions.

resultsThe ED of the intervention hospital registered 53 768 stays in 2016 and 57 965 in 2017 (+7.8%). In the intervention hospital, the median LOS was 215 min before the intervention and 186 min after the intervention. The exponentiated before-after estimator for ED LOS ≥4 hours was 0.79; 95% CI 0.77 to 0.81. The exponentiated before-after estimator for access block was 1.19; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.25. There was an increase in the proportion of 30 day readmissions in the intervention hospital (from 11.4% to 12.3%). After the intervention, the proportion of patients leaving without being seen by a physician decreased from 10.0% to 5.4%.

conclusionsThe implementation of a fast-track was associated with a decrease in stays lasting ≥4 hours without a decrease in access block. Further studies are needed to evaluate the causes of variability in ED LOS and their connections to quality of care indicators.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedControlled Before-After StudiesEfficiency, OrganizationalEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFranceHumansLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPatient ReadmissionTime Factorsemergency departmentfast-trackhealthcare qualityhospital readmissionslength of stay

Identifiers

PMID31221873
PMCPMC6588991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.