Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31221750›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Unified cochlear model for low- and high-frequency mammalian hearing.

Aritra Sasmal, Karl Grosh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Optimal Scale-Invariant Wavelet Representation and Filtering of Human Otoacoustic Emissions.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Optogenetics Reveals Roles for Supporting Cells in Force Transmission to and From Outer Hair Cells in the Mouse Cochlea.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Remarkable Outer Hair Cell: Proceedings of a Symposium in Honour of W. E. Brownell.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Review
  14. The Long Outer-Hair-Cell RC Time Constant: A Feature, Not a Bug, of the Mammalian Cochlea.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Deiters Cells Act as Mechanical Equalizers for Outer Hair Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Unbalanced bidirectional radial stiffness gradients within the organ of Corti promoted by TRIOBP.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aritra SasmalDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.ORCID 0000-0002-5231-2546
Karl GroshDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; grosh@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8704-6199
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Supplement: Active and Nonlinear Models for Cochlear MechanicsR01DC004084 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Karl Grosh · 1999 to 2026
$6.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spatial variations of the intricate cytoarchitecture, fluid scalae, and mechano-electric transduction in the mammalian cochlea have long been postulated to provide the organ with the ability to perform a real-time, time-frequency processing of sound. However, the precise manner by which this tripartite coupling enables the exquisite cochlear filtering has yet to be articulated in a base-to-apex mathematical model. Moreover, while sound-evoked tuning curves derived from mechanical gains are excellent surrogates for auditory nerve fiber thresholds at the base of the cochlea, this correlation fails at the apex. The key factors influencing the divergence of both mechanical and neural tuning at the apex, as well as the spatial variation of mechanical tuning, are incompletely understood. We develop a model that shows that the mechanical effects arising from the combination of the taper of the cochlear scalae and the spatial variation of the cytoarchitecture of the cochlea provide robust mechanisms that modulate the outer hair cell-mediated active response and provide the basis for the transition of the mechanical gain spectra along the cochlear spiral. Further, the model predicts that the neural tuning at the base is primarily governed by the mechanical filtering of the cochlear partition. At the apex, microscale fluid dynamics and nanoscale channel dynamics must also be invoked to describe the threshold neural tuning for low frequencies. Overall, the model delineates a physiological basis for the difference between basal and apical gain seen in experiments and provides a coherent description of high- and low-frequency cochlear tuning.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBiophysicsCochlear AqueductFinite Element AnalysisGuinea PigsHearingMammalsbiophysicscochlear mechanicsemergent system responsefinite-element methodlow-frequency hearing

Identifiers

PMID31221750
PMCPMC6628805
OpenAlexW2949834842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.