Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31221749›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Environment-to-phenotype mapping and adaptation strategies in varying environments.

BingKan Xue, Pablo Sartori, Stanislas Leibler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Growth-dependent sensory bet-hedging enhances collective navigation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Individual variation in thermally induced plasticity of metabolic rates: ecological and evolutionary implications for a warming world.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Safety Evaluation ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

BingKan XueThe Simons Center for Systems Biology, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540; bxue@rockefeller.edu livingmatter@rockefeller.edu.
Pablo SartoriThe Simons Center for Systems Biology, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540.
Stanislas LeiblerThe Simons Center for Systems Biology, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540; bxue@rockefeller.edu livingmatter@rockefeller.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological organisms exhibit diverse strategies for adapting to varying environments. For example, a population of organisms may express the same phenotype in all environments ("unvarying strategy") or follow environmental cues and express alternative phenotypes to match the environment ("tracking strategy"), or diversify into coexisting phenotypes to cope with environmental uncertainty ("bet-hedging strategy"). We introduce a general framework for studying how organisms respond to environmental variations, which models an adaptation strategy by an abstract mapping from environmental cues to phenotypic traits. Depending on the accuracy of environmental cues and the strength of natural selection, we find different adaptation strategies represented by mappings that maximize the long-term growth rate of a population. The previously studied strategies emerge as special cases of our model: The tracking strategy is favorable when environmental cues are accurate, whereas when cues are noisy, organisms can either use an unvarying strategy or, remarkably, use the uninformative cue as a source of randomness to bet hedge. Our model of the environment-to-phenotype mapping is based on a network with hidden units; the performance of the strategies is shown to rely on having a high-dimensional internal representation, which can even be random.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEnvironmentAdaptation, PhysiologicalPhenotypePopulation DynamicsSelection, Geneticevolutionary theoryfluctuating environmentsphenotypic plasticitypopulation dynamicssurvival strategies

Identifiers

PMID31221749
PMCPMC6628789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.