Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31221211›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol.

April Morrow, Emily Hogden, Yoon-Jung Kang, Julia Steinberg, Karen Canfell, Michael J Solomon, James G Kench, Anthony J Gill, Tim Shaw, Nicholas Pachter and 6 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

April MorrowCancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, NSW, Australia.
Emily HogdenCancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, NSW, Australia.
Yoon-Jung KangCancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, NSW, Australia.
Julia SteinbergCancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, NSW, Australia.
Karen CanfellCancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, NSW, Australia.
Michael J SolomonUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
James G KenchUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anthony J GillUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Tim ShawUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Nicholas PachterGenetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia.
Bonny ParkinsonMacquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia.
Luke WolfendenSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Gillian MitchellFamilial Cancer Research Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Finlay MacraeColorectal Medicine and Genetics, and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kathy TuckerHereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Syndey, NSW, Australia.
Natalie TaylorCancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, NSW, Australia. Natalie.Taylor@nswcc.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0280-0883

Funding

Cancer Australia 1123924Cancer Institute NSW (AU) 2017/CDF005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited, cancer predisposition syndrome associated with an increased risk of colorectal, endometrial and other cancer types. Identifying individuals with LS allows access to cancer risk management strategies proven to reduce cancer incidence and improve survival. However, LS is underdiagnosed and genetic referral rates are poor. Improving LS referral is complex, and requires multisystem behaviour change. Although barriers have been identified, evidence-based strategies to facilitate behaviour change are lacking. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a theory-based implementation approach against a non-theory based approach for improving detection of LS amongst Australian patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

methodsA two-arm parallel cluster randomised trial design will be used to compare two identical, structured implementation approaches, distinguished only by the use of theory to identify barriers and design targeted intervention strategies, to improve LS referral practices in eight large Australian hospital networks. Each hospital network will be randomly allocated to a trial arm, with stratification by state. A trained healthcare professional will lead the following phases at each site: (1) undertake baseline clinical practice audits, (2) form multidisciplinary Implementation Teams, (3) identify target behaviours for practice change, (4) identify barriers to change, (5) generate intervention strategies, (6) support staff to implement interventions and (7) evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention using post-implementation clinical data. The theoretical and non-theoretical components of each trial arm will be distinguished in phases 4-5. Study outcomes include a LS referral process map for each hospital network, with evaluation of the proportion of patients with risk-appropriate completion of the LS referral pathway within 2 months of CRC resection pre and post implementation. DISCUSSION: This trial will determine the more effective approach for improving the detection of LS amongst patients with CRC, whilst also advancing understanding of the impact of theory-based implementation approaches in complex health systems and the feasibility of training healthcare professionals to use them. Insights gained will guide the development of future interventions to improve LS identification on a larger scale and across different contexts, as well as efforts to address the gap between evidence and practice in the rapidly evolving field of genomic research.

trial registrationANZCTR, ACTRN12618001072202 . Registered on 27 June 2018.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicReferral and ConsultationColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareBehaviour changeHereditary cancerImplementationLynch syndromeTheoretical domains framework

Identifiers

PMID31221211
PMCPMC6585019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.