ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019
Serological screening of immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G during pregnancy for predicting congenital cytomegalovirus infection.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Economic evaluation of newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection: A systematic review.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- What are the neurodevelopmental outcomes of children with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection at birth? A systematic literature review.Reviews in medical virology · 2024Pooled it
- Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection Burden and Epidemiologic Risk Factors in Countries With Universal Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2021Pooled it
- Reliability of CMV-IgG kinetics in the diagnosis of CMV primary infection: sensitivity, specificity, and clinical implications.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Reinfection With Cytomegalovirus During Pregnancy: A Prospective Cohort Study in Canada.Journal of medical virology · 2025Article
- Decoding human cytomegalovirus for the development of innovative diagnostics to detect congenital infection.Pediatric research · 2024Review
- Human cytomegalovirus and neonatal infection.Current research in microbial sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Serological response to COVID-19 pneumonia and increasing severity over 18 months in a prospective cohort of hospitalized patients.Internal and emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Cross-sectional study to assess awareness of cytomegalovirus infection among pregnant women in Germany.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Inconsistent Provider Testing Practices for Congenital Cytomegalovirus: Missed Diagnoses and Missed Opportunities.International journal of neonatal screening · 2022Article
- Early immune surveillance to predict cytomegalovirus outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Nedd8-Activating Enzyme Is a Druggable Host Dependency Factor of Human and Mouse Cytomegalovirus.Viruses · 2021Article
- Seroprevalence of CMV IgG and IgM in Korean women of childbearing age.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021Article
- The value of interleukin-6 (IL-6) within 6 hours after birth in the prompt diagnosis of early-onset neonatal sepsis.Translational pediatrics · 2020Article
- TORCH screening used appropriately in China?─three years results from a teaching hospital in northwest China.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Article
- Provider-Led Interventions to Reduce Congenital Cytomegalovirus.Journal of midwifery & women's healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most frequent pathogens for congenital infections. Most cases of congenital CMV infection (cCMV) are asymptomatic at birth, but sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) or neurodevelopmental delay can appear later in childhood. This prospective study examined the practicability of serological screening for anti-CMV immunoglobulin (Ig) G and anti-CMV IgM in pregnant women.
methodsA total of 11,753 pregnant women were examined for CMV IgG and CMV IgM during the first or second trimester. When IgM was positive, IgG was reevaluated more than two weeks later. When IgG was negative, IgG was reevaluated in the second or third trimester. All neonates from mothers with positive/borderline IgM or IgG seroconversion underwent polymerase chain reaction assay for CMV using urine samples to diagnose cCMV. Levels of IgG and IgM were compared between mothers with and without cCMV. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for IgM titers were analyzed.
resultsEight of 500 neonates (1.6%) born from mothers with positive IgG and positive IgM, and 3 of 13 neonates (23.1%) born from mothers with IgG seroconversion were diagnosed with cCMV. Neither IgM titers nor IgG titers differed significantly between cCMV and non-cCMV groups. The area under the ROC curve was 0.716 and the optimal cut-off for IgM was 7.28 index (sensitivity = 0.625, specificity = 0.965, positive predictive value = 0.238, negative predictive value = 0.993). Titers of IgG were not frequently elevated in pregnant women with positive IgM during the observation period, including in those with cCMV. All 11 cCMV cases were asymptomatic at birth and none had shown SNHL or developmental delay as of the last regular visit (mean age, 40 months).
conclusionsSeroconversion of CMV IgG and high-titer IgM during early pregnancy are predictors of cCMV. High IgM titer (> 7.28 index) is a predictor despite relatively low sensitivity. Levels of IgG had already plateaued at first evaluation in mothers with cCMV. Maternal screening offered insufficient positive predictive value for diagnosing cCMV, but allowed identifying asymptomatic cCMV cases in an early stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.