Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31221099›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2019

Chinese health literacy scale for tuberculosis patients: a study on development and psychometric testing.

Yan Li, Shaoru Zhang, Tianhua Zhang, Yi Cao, Weiping Liu, Hualin Jiang, Dan Ren, Jing Ren, Haini Liu, Zhongqiu Hua

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yan LiDepartment of Nursing, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xian, 710061, China.
Shaoru ZhangDepartment of Nursing, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xian, 710061, China. TGshru011@126.com.
Tianhua ZhangShaanxi Provincial Institute for TB Control and Prevention, Xian, 710048, China.
Yi CaoDepartment of Nursing, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xian, 710061, China.
Weiping LiuShaanxi Provincial Institute for TB Control and Prevention, Xian, 710048, China.
Hualin JiangDepartment of Nursing, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xian, 710061, China.
Dan RenDepartment of Nursing, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xian, 710061, China.
Jing RenDepartment of Nursing, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xian, 710061, China.
Haini LiuDepartment of Nursing, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xian, 710061, China.
Zhongqiu HuaDepartment of Nursing, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xian, 710061, China.
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNShaanxi Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 71774131National Science Foundation of China 71373203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of health literacy on tuberculosis patients has not been evaluated in China, in part because few special health literacy measurements exist.

methodsA three-step design process was used: (1) Scale construction: Based on the model of revised Bloom's taxonomy, the item-pool was drafted from a literature review, focus group discussion, and in-depth interviews. In addition, a Delphi survey was used in order to select items for inclusion in the scales; (2) Pilot study: Acceptability and clarity were tested with 60 tuberculosis patients; and (3) Psychometric testing: Validity analysis includes content validity, construct validity, and discriminative validity. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient, split-half reliability, and test-retest method were used to assess reliability. Finally, a receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to generate a cut-off point.

resultsThe final scale had 29 items with four domains. The item level Content Validity Index ranged from 0.70 to 1.0, and the scale level Content Validity Index was 0.95. The mean score among the lowest 27% group was significantly lower than that those of the highest 27% group (p < 0.01), which supports adequate discriminant validity. Explanatory factor analysis produced a clear four-factor construct, explaining 47.254% of the total variance. Factor 1 and Factor 2 were consistent with read and memorize TB-related words; Factor 3 was associated with understand the meaning of the health education leaflets and examine if TB patients can apply the correct approach to correct context; Factor 4 was related to the ability of TB patient to calculate and identify what unspecified assumptions are included in known conditions. The confirmatory factory analysis results confirmed that a four-factor model was an acceptable fit to the data, with a goodness-of-fit index = 0.930, adjusted goodness of fit index = 0.970, root mean square error of approximation = 0.069, and χ2/df = 2.153. The scale had good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Additionally, the receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that the cut-off point for the instrument was set at 45 and 35.

conclusionsThe Chinese Health Literacy scale for Tuberculosis has good reliability and validity, and it could be used for measuring the health literacy of Chinese patients with tuberculosis.

Indexed as

PsychometricsAdolescentAdultAgedArea Under CurveChinaFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsROC CurveSurveys and QuestionnairesTuberculosisYoung AdultHealth literacyPsychometric testingScaleTuberculosis patients

Identifiers

PMID31221099
PMCPMC6587253
OpenAlexW2950478834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.