Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31221025›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2019

Knowledge-Based Statistical Inference Method for Plan Quality Quantification.

Jiang Zhang, Q Jackie Wu, Yaorong Ge, Chunhao Wang, Yang Sheng, Jatinder Palta, Joseph K Salama, Fang-Fang Yin, Jiahan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Knowledge-Based Tradeoff Hyperplanes for Head and Neck Treatment Planning.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Data-Driven Dose-Volume Histogram Prediction.Advances in radiation oncology
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jiang Zhang1 Division of Medical Physics, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5807-1686
Q Jackie Wu2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8235-2322
Yaorong Ge3 College of Computing and Informatics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Chunhao Wang2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6945-7119
Yang Sheng2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Jatinder Palta4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Joseph K Salama2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Fang-Fang Yin2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Jiahan Zhang2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4288-6503

Funding

Developing knowledge models to enable rapid learning in radiation therapyR01CA201212 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GE, YAORONG, WU, QINGRONG JACKIE · 2016 to 2019
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA201212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of the study is to develop a geometrically adaptive and statistically robust plan quality inference method. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We propose a knowledge-based plan quality inference method that references to similar plans in the historical database for patient-specific plan quality evaluation. First, a novel plan similarity metric with high-dimension geometrical difference quantification is utilized to retrieve similar plans. Subsequently, dosimetric statistical inferences are obtained from the selected similar plans. Two plan quality metrics-dosimetric result probability and dose deviation index-are proposed to quantify plan quality among prior similar plans. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, we exported 927 clinically approved head and neck treatment plans. Eight organs at risk, including brain stem, cord, larynx, mandible, pharynx, oral cavity, left parotid and right parotid, were analyzed. Twelve suboptimal plans identified by dosimetric result probability were replanned to validate the capability of the proposed methods in identifying inferior plans.

resultsAfter replanning, left and right parotid median doses are reduced by 31.7% and 18.2%, respectively; 83% of these cases would not be identified as suboptimal without the proposed similarity plan selection. Analysis of population plan quality reveals that average parotid sparing has been improving significantly over time (21.7% dosimetric result probability reduction from year 2006-2007 to year 2016-2017). Notably, the increasing dose sparing over time in retrospective plan quality analysis is strongly correlated with the increasing dose prescription ratios to the 2 planning targets, revealing the collective trend in planning conventions.

conclusionsThe proposed similar plan retrieval and analysis methodology has been proven to be predictive of the current plan quality. Therefore, the proposed workflow can potentially be applied in the clinics as a real-time plan quality assurance tool. The proposed metrics can also serve the purpose of plan quality analytics in finding connections and historical trends in the clinical treatment planning workflow.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAlgorithmsHumansQuality Assurance, Health CareRadiometryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studiesdata analyticsknowledge-based planningplan quality assurance

Identifiers

PMID31221025
PMCPMC6589991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.