Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31220992›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Prognostic Value of Carotid and Radial Artery Reservoir-Wave Parameters in End-Stage Renal Disease.

Catherine Fortier, Gabrielle Côté, Fabrice Mac-Way, Rémi Goupil, Louis-Charles Desbiens, Marie-Pier Desjardins, Karine Marquis, Bernhard Hametner, Siegfried Wassertheurer, Martin G Schultz and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The modified arterial reservoir: An update with consideration of asymptotic pressure (Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Catherine Fortier1 CHU de Québec Research Center L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec Hospital Québec Quebec Canada.
Gabrielle Côté2 Division of Nephrology Faculty of Medicine Université Laval Québec Quebec Canada.
Fabrice Mac-Way1 CHU de Québec Research Center L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec Hospital Québec Quebec Canada.
Rémi Goupil3 Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal Montréal Quebec Canada.
Louis-Charles Desbiens1 CHU de Québec Research Center L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec Hospital Québec Quebec Canada.
Marie-Pier Desjardins1 CHU de Québec Research Center L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec Hospital Québec Quebec Canada.
Karine Marquis1 CHU de Québec Research Center L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec Hospital Québec Quebec Canada.
Bernhard Hametner4 Center for Health & Bioresources AIT Austrian Institute of Technology Vienna Austria.
Siegfried Wassertheurer4 Center for Health & Bioresources AIT Austrian Institute of Technology Vienna Austria.
Martin G Schultz5 Menzies Institute for Medical Research University of Tasmania Hobart Australia.
James E Sharman5 Menzies Institute for Medical Research University of Tasmania Hobart Australia.
Mohsen Agharazii1 CHU de Québec Research Center L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec Hospital Québec Quebec Canada.
Hôtel-Dieu de Québec · CAUniversité Laval · CAAustrian Institute of Technology · ATUniversity of Tasmania · AUHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Reservoir-wave approach is an alternative model of arterial hemodynamics based on the assumption that measured arterial pressure is composed of volume-related (reservoir pressure) and wave-related components (excess pressure). However, the clinical utility of reservoir-wave approach remains debatable. Methods and Results In a single-center cohort of 260 dialysis patients, we examined whether carotid and radial reservoir-wave parameters were associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Central pulse pressure and augmentation index at 75 beats per minute were determined by radial arterial tonometry through generalized transfer function. Carotid and radial reservoir-wave analysis were performed to determine reservoir pressure and excess pressure integral. After a median follow-up of 32 months, 171 (66%) deaths and 88 (34%) cardiovascular deaths occurred. In Cox regression analysis, carotid excess pressure integral was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.33 (95% CI , 1.14-1.54; P<0.001 per 1 SD) for all-cause and 1.45 (95% CI : 1.18-1.75; P<0.001 per 1 SD) for cardiovascular mortality. After adjustments for age, heart rate, sex, clinical characteristics and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, carotid excess pressure integral was consistently associated with increased risk of all-cause (hazard ratio per 1 SD, 1.30; 95% CI : 1.08-1.54; P=0.004) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio per 1 SD, 1.31; 95% CI : 1.04-1.63; P=0.019). Conversely, there were no significant associations between radial reservoir-wave parameters, central pulse pressure, augmentation index at 75 beats per minute, pressure forward, pressure backward and reflection magnitude, and all-cause or cardiovascular mortality after adjustment for comorbidities. Conclusions These observations support the clinical value of reservoir-wave approach parameters of large central elastic vessels in end-stage renal disease.

Indexed as

Blood PressurePulse Wave AnalysisAgedArterial PressureCardiovascular DiseasesCarotid ArteriesCause of DeathFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleManometryMiddle AgedMortalityPrognosisProportional Hazards Modelsaortic stiffnessend‐stage renal diseaseexcess pressurepulse wave analysispulse wave velocitywave separation analysis

Identifiers

PMID31220992
PMCPMC6662378
OpenAlexW2950697766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.