Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31220455›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology2019

Detection and Classification of Novel Renal Histologic Phenotypes Using Deep Neural Networks.

Susan Sheehan, Seamus Mawe, Rachel E Cianciolo, Ron Korstanje, J Matthew Mahoney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Artificial intelligence in glomerular diseases.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susan SheehanThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine. Electronic address: susan.sheehan@jax.org.
Seamus MaweVermont Complex Systems Center, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.
Rachel E CiancioloDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Ron KorstanjeThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine.
J Matthew MahoneyDepartment of Neurological Sciences, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, and the Department of Computer Science, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI William Carl Skarnes · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
Translational CoreP30AG038070 · NIA · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI John Matthew Mahoney · 2010 to 2026
$19.3M
The Jackson Laboratory Center for Precision Genetics: From New Models to Novel TherapeuticsU54OD020351 · OD · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI NISHINA, PATSY M · 2015 to 2019
$10.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NIA NIH HHS P30 AG038070NIH HHS U54 OD020351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent and increased accessibility of deep neural networks (DNNs), complex properties of histologic images can be rigorously and reproducibly quantified. We used DNN-based transfer learning to analyze histologic images of periodic acid-Schiff-stained renal sections from a cohort of mice with different genotypes. We demonstrate that DNN-based machine learning has strong generalization performance on multiple histologic image processing tasks. The neural network extracted quantitative image features and used them as classifiers to look for differences between mice of different genotypes. Excellent performance was observed at segmenting glomeruli from non-glomerular structure and subsequently predicting the genotype of the animal on the basis of glomerular quantitative image features. The DNN-based genotype classifications highly correlate with mesangial matrix expansion scored by a pathologist (R.E.C.), which differed in these animals. In addition, by analyzing non-glomeruli images, the neural network identified novel histologic features that differed by genotype, including the presence of vacuoles, nuclear count, and proximal tubule brush border integrity, which was validated with immunohistologic staining. These features were not identified in systematic pathologic examination. Our study demonstrates the power of DNNs to extract biologically relevant phenotypes and serve as a platform for discovering novel phenotypes. These results highlight the synergistic possibilities for pathologists and DNNs to radically scale up our ability to generate novel mechanistic hypotheses in disease.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerNeural PathwaysAldehyde OxidoreductasesAnimalsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKidneyMaleMiceMice, KnockoutPhenotypeAldehyde OxidoreductasesFAR2 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID31220455
PMCPMC6723211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.