Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31220320›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2020

Developing a couple typology: A qualitative study of couple dynamics around physical activity.

Ida Griesemer, Ashley Phillips, Cynthia Khan, Stephanie Bahorski, Mary Altpeter, Leigh F Callahan, Laura S Porter, Christine Rini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Tale of Two Societies: Social Engagement, Marital Satisfaction, and Depressive Symptoms Among Couples in Rural and Urban China.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Walking Engagement in Mexican Americans Who Participated in a Community-Wide Step Challenge in El Paso, TX.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ida GriesemerDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Ashley PhillipsThurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Cynthia KhanEconometrica, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA.
Stephanie BahorskiThurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Mary AltpeterThurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Leigh F CallahanThurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Laura S PorterDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Christine RiniJohn Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.

Funding

NIAMS Multidisciplinary Clinical Research CenterP60AR064166 · NIAMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SCHWARTZ, TODD A · 2013 to 2017
$5.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR064166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Partner-based social support can motivate engagement in physical activity (PA); however, couples approach exchanging support in different ways. This study aimed to elucidate the role of relationship dynamics in couple-based support for PA, with the goal of informing intervention strategies that will effectively leverage couple characteristics to increase support for PA. We conducted a qualitative study of couples who completed a longitudinal study of social support for PA. Participants were people with osteoarthritis who were not meeting PA recommendations and their cohabitating partners (n = 19 couples). We conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews and analyzed transcripts using narrative analysis. Participants were 76% non-Hispanic White and, on average, 62 years old. Themes in the data included (a) attitudes about working together to be more active (ranging from positive to negative) and (b) couples' narrative concordance (high to low shared reality). We developed a couple typology with four categories: "Working together works" (positive attitudes/high shared reality; n = 4 couples), "Doing our own thing" (range of attitudes with practical/preferential barriers to working together/high shared reality; n = 5 couples), "Conscious conflict" (discrepant attitudes/high shared reality; n = 5 couples), and "Different realities" (discrepant attitudes/low shared reality; n = 5 couples). We describe examples of each type. In a sample of 19 couples, there were observable differences in participants' attitudes about working together to be more active and in couples' shared reality around those attitudes. Future research should investigate implications for the efficacy of interventions and, if warranted, develop methods to identify couple types and offer appropriate intervention strategies.

Indexed as

ExerciseMotivationHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial SupportCouplesPhysical activityQualitative researchSocial supportTypology

Identifiers

PMID31220320
PMCPMC7413183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.