Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31220200›Full record

Trial reportAge and ageing2019

Long-term effect of community-based continence promotion on urinary symptoms, falls and healthy active life expectancy among older women: cluster randomised trial.

Cara Tannenbaum, Xavier Fritel, Alex Halme, Eleanor van den Heuvel, Jeffrey Jutai, Adrian Wagg

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Age and ageing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Cara TannenbaumDepartment of Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Xavier FritelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculté de Médecine et Pharmacie, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Alex HalmeDepartment of Geriatrics, Internal Medicine Resident, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Eleanor van den HeuvelDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Brunel Institute for Ageing Studies, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK.
Jeffrey JutaiDepartment of Health Sciences, Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario Canada.
Adrian WaggDepartment of Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Brunel University of London · GBMcGill University · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversité de Poitiers · FRUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe long-term effectiveness of group continence promotion delivered via community organisations on female urinary incontinence, falls and healthy life expectancy remains unknown.

methodsA pragmatic cluster randomised trial was conducted among 909 women aged 65-98 years with urinary incontinence, recruited from 377 community organisations in the UK, Canada and France. A total of 184 organisations were randomised to an in-person 60-min incontinence self-management workshop (461 participants), and 193 to a control healthy ageing workshop (448 participants). The primary outcome was self-reported incontinence improvement at 1-year. Falls and gains in health utility were secondary outcomes.

resultsA total 751 women, mean age 78.0, age range 65-98 completed the trial (83%). At 1-year, 15% of the intervention group versus 6.9% of controls reported significant improvements in urinary symptoms, (difference 8.1%, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 4.0-12.1%, intracluster correlation 0.04, number-needed-to-treat 13) and 35% versus 19% reported any improvement (risk difference 16.0%, 95% CI 10.4-21.5, number-needed-to-treat 6). The proportion of fallers decreased from 42% to 36% in the intervention group (-8.0%, 95% CI -14.8 - -1.0) and from 44% to 34% in the control group (-10.3%, 95% CI -17.4 - -3.6), no difference between groups. Both intervention and control groups experienced a gain in health utility (0.022 points (95% CI 0.005-0.04) versus 0.035 (95% CI 0.017-0.052), respectively), with no significant difference between groups.

conclusionCommunity-based group continence promotion achieves long-term benefits on older women's urinary symptoms, without improvement in falls or healthy life expectancy compared with participation in a healthy ageing workshop.

Indexed as

Healthy AgingLife ExpectancyAccidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overCommunity Health ServicesEducationFemaleHealth PromotionHumansRisk Reduction BehaviorSelf-ManagementUrinary Incontinencecluster randomised trialfallshealth utilityolder peopleolder womenurinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID31220200
PMCPMC6593322
OpenAlexW2939831679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.