Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31220118›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Evaluation of bone allograft processing methods: Impact on decellularization efficacy, biocompatibility and mesenchymal stem cell functionality.

Alexander Rasch, Hendrik Naujokat, Fanlu Wang, Andreas Seekamp, Sabine Fuchs, Tim Klüter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Impact of animal source on biocompatibility of bone xenografts: A comparative animal study.Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Utility of Air Bladder-Derived Nanostructured ECM for Tissue Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  19. Adult Stem Cells for Bone Regeneration and Repair.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander RaschExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Hendrik NaujokatExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Fanlu WangExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Andreas SeekampExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Sabine FuchsExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7053-5893
Tim KlüterExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an ever-aging society the demand for bone-defect filling grafts continues to gain in importance. While autologous grafting still prevails as the gold standard, allografts and xenografts present viable alternatives with promising results. Physiochemical properties of a graft strongly depend on the processing method such as the decellularization protocol. In addition, the physiochemical characteristics are critical factors for a successful integration of the graft after the implantation and might influence mesenchymal stem cell function in therapeutic approaches combining grafts and autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Several decellularization methods have been proposed, however it still remains unclear which method results in favorable physiochemical properties or might be preferred in stem cell applications. In the first part of this study we compared two decellularization approaches resulting in chemically processed allografts (CPAs) or sonication-based processed allografts (SPAs). Each decellularization approach was compared for its decellularization efficacy and its influence on the grafts' surface texture and composition. In the second part of this study biocompatibility of grafts was assessed by testing the effect of extraction medium on MSC viability and comparing them to commercially available allografts and xenografts. Additionally, grafts' performance in terms of MSC functionality was assessed by reseeding with MSCs pre-differentiated in osteogenic medium and determining cell adhesion, proliferation, as well as alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and the degree of mineralization. In summary, results indicate a more effective decellularization for the SPA approach in comparison to the CPA approach. Even though SPA extracts induced a decrease in MSC viability, MSC performance after reseeding was comparable to commercially available grafts based on DNA quantification, alkaline phosphatase activity and quantification of mineralization. Commercial Tutoplast allografts showed overall the best effects on MSC functionality as indicated by extraction biocompatibility testing as well as by comparing proliferation and osteogenic differentiation.

Indexed as

Bone TransplantationMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAllograftsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone Marrow CellsCattleDistillationFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsBiocompatible MaterialsBio-OssMinerals

Identifiers

PMID31220118
PMCPMC6586299
OpenAlexW2950365108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.