ArticlePloS one2019
Evaluation of bone allograft processing methods: Impact on decellularization efficacy, biocompatibility and mesenchymal stem cell functionality.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards Sustainable Bone Grafting: Life Cycle Assessment of Donor Cadaver-Derived Allograft (BMG) Production Using a BMP-Preserving Approach.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Modern Approaches and Emerging Biological Therapies to Treat Fracture Nonunion.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Impact of animal source on biocompatibility of bone xenografts: A comparative animal study.Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry · 2025Article
- Purified bone xenografts: A novel and efficient animal bone substitute derived from an optimized supercritical COMaterials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Surgical mechanical properties of perfused decellularized massive bone allografts: An comparative in vivo test.PloS one · 2025Article
- Biological parameters for quality evaluation of allografts from the Brazilian National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics tissue bank.Cell and tissue banking · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Integrity of Allogeneic Bone Processed with High Hydrostatic Pressure: A Pilot Animal Study.Biomaterials research · 2024Article
- Atypical histological presentation of bone regeneration after insertion of cryoprotected allogeneic bone graft.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2024Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Mineralized Bone Allografts for Spinal Fusion Surgery.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Evaluation of decellularization process for developing osteogenic bovine cancellous bone scaffolds in-vitro.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Graphene Oxide Framework Structures and Coatings: Impact on Cell Adhesion and Pre-Vascularization Processes for Bone Grafts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Manufacturing artificial bone allografts: a perspective.Biomaterials translational · 2022Review
- Characterization of Osteogenesis and Chondrogenesis of Human Decellularized Allogeneic Bone with Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Bone Marrow, Adipose Tissue, and Wharton's Jelly.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- The Effect of Adding Modified Chitosan on the Strength Properties of Bacterial Cellulose for Clinical Applications.Polymers · 2021Article
- An Extrudable Partially Demineralized Allogeneic Bone Paste Exhibits a Similar Bone Healing Capacity as the "Gold Standard" Bone Graft.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Utility of Air Bladder-Derived Nanostructured ECM for Tissue Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Adult Stem Cells for Bone Regeneration and Repair.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019Review
- Decellularization for the retention of tissue niches.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In an ever-aging society the demand for bone-defect filling grafts continues to gain in importance. While autologous grafting still prevails as the gold standard, allografts and xenografts present viable alternatives with promising results. Physiochemical properties of a graft strongly depend on the processing method such as the decellularization protocol. In addition, the physiochemical characteristics are critical factors for a successful integration of the graft after the implantation and might influence mesenchymal stem cell function in therapeutic approaches combining grafts and autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Several decellularization methods have been proposed, however it still remains unclear which method results in favorable physiochemical properties or might be preferred in stem cell applications. In the first part of this study we compared two decellularization approaches resulting in chemically processed allografts (CPAs) or sonication-based processed allografts (SPAs). Each decellularization approach was compared for its decellularization efficacy and its influence on the grafts' surface texture and composition. In the second part of this study biocompatibility of grafts was assessed by testing the effect of extraction medium on MSC viability and comparing them to commercially available allografts and xenografts. Additionally, grafts' performance in terms of MSC functionality was assessed by reseeding with MSCs pre-differentiated in osteogenic medium and determining cell adhesion, proliferation, as well as alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and the degree of mineralization. In summary, results indicate a more effective decellularization for the SPA approach in comparison to the CPA approach. Even though SPA extracts induced a decrease in MSC viability, MSC performance after reseeding was comparable to commercially available grafts based on DNA quantification, alkaline phosphatase activity and quantification of mineralization. Commercial Tutoplast allografts showed overall the best effects on MSC functionality as indicated by extraction biocompatibility testing as well as by comparing proliferation and osteogenic differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.