Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31220097›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2019

Venous thromboembolism risk stratification for patients with lower limb trauma and cast or brace immobilization.

D Douillet, B Nemeth, A Penaloza, G Le Gal, T Moumneh, S C Cannegieter, P M Roy

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. What's new in VTE risk and prevention in orthopedic surgery.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

D DouilletDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Angers University Hospital, MITOVASC Institute, University of Angers, Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7986-7552
B NemethDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1214-5923
A PenalozaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
G Le GalThrombosis Programme, Division of Hæmatology-Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa-Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9253-248X
T MoumnehDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Angers University Hospital, MITOVASC Institute, University of Angers, Angers, France.
S C CannegieterDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4707-2303
P M RoyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Angers University Hospital, MITOVASC Institute, University of Angers, Angers, France.
Université d'Angers · FRLeiden University Medical Center · NLCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThromboprophylaxis for patients with non-surgical isolated lower-limb trauma requiring immobilization is a matter of debate. Our aim was to develop and validate a clinical risk- stratification model based on Trauma, Immobilization and Patients' characteristics (the TIP score).

methodsThe TIP score criteria and the cut-off were selected by a consensus of international experts (n = 27) using the Delphi method. Retrospective validation was performed in a population-based case-control study (MEGA study). The potential score's impact in anticoagulant treatment was assessed in a prospective single-center observational cohort study.

findingsAfter four successive rounds, 30 items constituting the TIP score were selected: thirteen items for trauma, three for immobilization and 14 for patient characteristics were selected, each rated on a scale of 1 to 3. In the validation database, the TIP score had an AUC of 0·77 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.85). Using the cut-off proposed by the experts (≥5) and assuming a prevalence of 1·8%, the TIP scores had a sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive values of 89·9%, 30·7% and 99·4% respectively. In the prospective cohort, 84·2% (165/196) of all the patients concerned who presented at the emergency department had a low VTE risk not requiring thromboprophylaxis according to their TIP scores. The 3-month rate of symptomatic VTE was 1/196 [95% CI 0.1-2.8] this patient was in the sub-group TIP score ≥5.

conclusionFor patients with non-surgical lower-limb trauma and orthopedic immobilization, the TIP score allows an individual VTE risk-assessment and shows promising results in guiding thromboprophylaxis.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesCasts, SurgicalDelphi TechniqueHumansImmobilizationLeg InjuriesProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsVenous Thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID31220097
PMCPMC6586277
OpenAlexW2950987781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.