Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31220096›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Modifiable patient-related barriers and their association with breast cancer detection practices among Ugandan women without a diagnosis of breast cancer.

Jake W Sharp, Daniel S Hippe, Gertrude Nakigudde, Benjamin O Anderson, Zeridah Muyinda, Yamile Molina, John R Scheel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Breast cancer screening during the Syrian crisis: A cross-sectional study.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jake W SharpDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Daniel S HippeDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2427-4404
Gertrude NakiguddeUganda Women's Cancer Support Organisation (UWOCASO), Kampala, Uganda.
Benjamin O AndersonDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7217-7428
Zeridah MuyindaDepartment of Radiology, Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Yamile MolinaCommunity Health Sciences Division, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
John R ScheelDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0998-0098
University of Washington · USMulago Hospital · UGUganda Cancer Institute · UGUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Empowering Latinas to Obtain Breast Cancer ScreeningsK01CA193918 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MOLINA, YAMILE · 2016 to 2020
$729k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA193918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most women with breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are diagnosed with late-staged disease. The current study assesses patient-related barriers among women from a general SSA population to better understand how patient-related barriers contribute to diagnostic delays. Using convenience-based sampling, 401 Ugandan women without breast cancer were surveyed to determine how prior participation in cancer detection practices correlate with patient-related barriers to prompt diagnosis. In a predominantly poor (76%) and rural population (75%), the median age of the participants was 38. Of the women surveyed, 155 (46%) had prior exposure to breast cancer education, 92 (27%) performed breast self-examination (BSE) and 68 (20%) had undergone a recent clinical breast examination (CBE), breast ultrasound or breast biopsy. The most commonly identified barriers to prompt diagnosis were knowledge deficits regarding early diagnosis (79%), economic barriers to accessing care (68%), fear (37%) and poor social support (24%). However, only women who reported knowledge deficits-a modifiable barrier-were less likely to participate in cancer detection practices (p<0.05). Women in urban and rural areas were similarly likely to report economic barriers, knowledge deficits and/or poor social support, but rural women were less likely than urban women to have received breast cancer education and/or perform BSE (p<0.001). Women who have had prior breast cancer education (p<0.001) and/or who perform BSE (p = 0.02) were more likely to know where she can go to receive a diagnostic breast evaluation. These findings suggest that SSA countries developing early breast cancer detection programs should specifically address modifiable knowledge deficits among women less likely to achieve a diagnostic work-up to reduce diagnostic delays and improve breast cancer outcomes.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRural PopulationSocial SupportUgandaUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID31220096
PMCPMC6586444
OpenAlexW2952496007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.