Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31219340›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2019

Intraoperative nerve monitoring during thyroidectomy: evaluation of signal loss, prognostic value and surgical strategy.

E O Gür, M Haciyanli, S Karaisli, S Haciyanli, E Kamer, T Acar, Y Kumkumoglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparison of stimulating dissector and intermittent stimulating probe for the identification of recurrent laryngeal nerve in reoperative setting.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

E O GürDepartment of General Surgery, Izmir Katip Celebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.
M HaciyanliDepartment of General Surgery, Izmir Katip Celebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.
S KaraisliDepartment of General Surgery, Izmir Katip Celebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.
S HaciyanliDepartment of General Surgery, Izmir Katip Celebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.
E KamerDepartment of General Surgery, Izmir Katip Celebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.
T AcarDepartment of General Surgery, Izmir Katip Celebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.
Y KumkumogluDepartment of General Surgery, Izmir Katip Celebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntraoperative neural monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve has been widely used to avoid nerve injury during thyroidectomy. We discuss the results of the change in surgical strategy after unilateral signal loss surgeries using intermittent intraoperative neural monitoring in a high-volume referral centre. MATERIALS AND

methodsDetails of consecutive patients who underwent thyroidectomy with intermittent intraoperative neural monitoring between January 2014 and December 2017 were prospectively recorded and retrospectively reviewed. Loss of signal was defined as recurrent laryngeal nerve amplitude level lower than 100 μV during surgery. The rate of loss of signal and change in surgical strategy during the operation were evaluated.

resultsLoss of signal was detected in 25 (5.4%) of 456 patients for whom intermittent intraoperative neural monitoring was performed. Four patients had anatomic nerve disruption and surgery was completed by an experienced endocrine surgeon making use of intraoperative neural monitoring with continuous vagal stimulation. Staged thyroidectomy was performed on 16 patients with unilateral loss of signal in whom the nerves were intact visually. Postoperative vocal cord paralysis was encountered in 18 of 21 (85.7%) patients with loss of signal, and 16 of 18 (88.8%) were improved during the follow-up period. Patients' voices were subjectively normal to the surgeon postoperatively in 9 of 21 (42.8%) patients who were found to have loss of signal with intact nerves.

conclusionsIntraoperative neural monitoring can be used safely in thyroid surgery to avoid recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. It enables the surgeon to diagnose recurrent laryngeal nerve injury intraoperatively to estimate the postoperative nerve function and to modify the surgical strategy to avoid bilateral vocal cord paralysis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativePostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRecurrent Laryngeal NerveRecurrent Laryngeal Nerve InjuriesRetrospective StudiesThyroidectomyIntraoperative neuromonitoringRecurrent laryngeal nerveThyroidectomy

Identifiers

PMID31219340
PMCPMC6818062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.