Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31219227›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2019

A European multicentre drug utilisation study of the impact of regulatory measures on prescribing of codeine for pain in children.

Karin Hedenmalm, Kevin Blake, Katherine Donegan, Miguel-Angel Macia, Miguel Gil, Julie Williams, Dolores Montero, Gianmario Candore, Daniel Morales, Xavier Kurz and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Opioid Analgesic Prescription in French Children: A National Population-Based Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Karin HedenmalmBusiness, Data and Analytics Department, European Medicines Agency, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9544-9163
Kevin BlakeSpecialised Scientific Disciplines Department, European Medicines Agency, London, UK.
Katherine DoneganVigilance and Risk Management of Medicines, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.
Miguel-Angel MaciaDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance, Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel GilDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance, Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices, Madrid, Spain.
Julie WilliamsPharmacovigilance and Risk Management Planning, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.
Dolores MonteroDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance, Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices, Madrid, Spain.
Gianmario CandoreBusiness, Data and Analytics Department, European Medicines Agency, London, UK.
Daniel MoralesPharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Department, European Medicines Agency, London, UK.
Xavier KurzPharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Department, European Medicines Agency, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9838-7754
Peter ArlettPharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Department, European Medicines Agency, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn June 2013, following recommendations from the World Health Organization (WHO) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency agreed updates to the codeine product information regarding use for pain in children younger than 12 years and children undergoing tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy (TA) for obstructive sleep apnoea. This study was conducted to (a) assess effectiveness of these measures on codeine prescribing in the "real-world" setting and (b) test feasibility of a study using a common protocol by regulators with access to databases.

methodsThe study was performed using BIFAP (Spain), CPRD (UK), and IMS® Disease Analyzer (France and Germany) databases. Prescribers included general practitioners (GPs) (France and UK), GPs and paediatricians together (Spain), and GPs, paediatricians, and ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialists separately (Germany). Between January 2010 and June 2015, prevalence of codeine prescribing was obtained every 6 months, and a time series analysis (joinpoint) was performed. Codeine prescribing within ±30 days of TA was also identified. Furthermore, doses, durations, and prior prescribing of other analgesics were investigated.

resultsOver the 5-year period, codeine prescribing decreased in children younger than 12 years (by 84% in France and Spain, 44% in GP practices in Germany, and 33% in the United Kingdom). The temporal pattern was compatible with the regulatory intervention in France and the United Kingdom, whereas a decrease throughout the study period was seen in Germany and Spain. Decreased prescribing associated with TA was suggested in ENT practices in Germany.

conclusionsCodeine prescribing for children decreased in line with introduced regulatory measures. Multidatabase studies assessing impact of measures by EU regulators are feasible.

Indexed as

AdenoidectomyAdolescentAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidChildChild, PreschoolCodeineDrug and Narcotic ControlEuropeFemaleHumansInfantMalePostoperative PainPractice Patterns, Physicians'Sleep Apnea, ObstructiveAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidCodeinechildrencodeinedrug utilizationpharmacoepidemiologyrisk minimization measures

Identifiers

PMID31219227
PMCPMC6771637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.