Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31219153›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2020

Genomic Surveillance of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A Mathematical Early Modeling Study of Cost-effectiveness.

Amy Dymond, Heather Davies, Stuart Mealing, Vicki Pollit, Francesc Coll, Nicholas M Brown, Sharon J Peacock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Modeling transmission of pathogens in healthcare settings.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2021
    Review
  16. Method for Economic Evaluation of Bacterial Whole Genome Sequencing Surveillance Compared to Standard of Care in Detecting Hospital Outbreaks.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of whole-genome sequencing during an outbreak of carbapenem-resistantAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amy DymondYork Health Economics Consortium, United Kingdom.
Heather DaviesYork Health Economics Consortium, United Kingdom.
Stuart MealingYork Health Economics Consortium, United Kingdom.
Vicki PollitYork Health Economics Consortium, United Kingdom.
Francesc CollLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Nicholas M BrownCambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Sharon J PeacockLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 201344/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) identifies unsuspected transmission events and outbreaks. Used proactively, this could direct early and highly targeted infection control interventions to prevent ongoing spread. Here, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of this intervention in a model that compared whole-genome sequencing plus current practice versus current practice alone.

methodsA UK cost-effectiveness study was conducted using an early model built from the perspective of the National Health Service and personal social services. The effectiveness of sequencing was based on the relative reduction in total MRSA acquisitions in a cohort of hospitalized patients in the year following their index admissions. A sensitivity analysis was used to illustrate and assess the level of confidence associated with the conclusions of our economic evaluation.

resultsA cohort of 65 000 patients were run through the model. Assuming that sequencing would result in a 90% reduction in MRSA acquisition, 290 new MRSA cases were avoided. This gave an absolute reduction of 28.8% and avoidance of 2 MRSA-related deaths. Base case results indicated that the use of routine, proactive MRSA sequencing would be associated with estimated cost savings of over £728 290 per annual hospitalized cohort. The impact in total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was relatively modest, with sequencing leading to an additional 14.28 QALYs gained. Results were most sensitive to changes in the probability of a MRSA-negative patient acquiring MRSA during their hospital admission.

conclusionsWe showed that proactive genomic surveillance of MRSA is likely to be cost-effective. Further evaluation is required in the context of a prospective study.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcal InfectionsCost-Benefit AnalysisGenomicsHumansProspective StudiesState Medicinecost-effectivenessMRSAwhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID31219153
PMCPMC7145999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.