Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31219092›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2019

Current antibiotic use in the treatment of enteric fever in children.

Sushila Dahiya, Rooma Malik, Priyanka Sharma, Archana Sashi, Rakesh Lodha, Sushil Kumar Kabra, Seema Sood, Bimal Kumar Das, Kamini Walia, V C Ohri and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Case Report:The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sushila DahiyaDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rooma MalikDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Priyanka SharmaDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Archana SashiDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rakesh LodhaDepartment of Paediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sushil Kumar KabraDepartment of Paediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Seema SoodDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Bimal Kumar DasDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Kamini WaliaDivision of Epidemiology & Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
V C OhriDivision of Epidemiology & Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Arti KapilDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives: Antimicrobial resistance is a major challenge in the treatment of typhoid fever with limited choices left to empirically treat these patients. The present study was undertaken to determine the current practices of antibiotic use in children attending a tertiary care hospital in north India. Methods: This was a descriptive observational study in children suffering from enteric fever as per the case definition including clinical and laboratory parameters. The antibiotic audit in hospitalized children was measured as days of therapy per 1000 patient days and in outpatient department (OPD) as antibiotic prescription on the treatment card. Results: A total of 128 children with enteric fever were included in the study, of whom, 30 were hospitalized and 98 were treated from OPD. The mean duration of fever was 9.5 days at the time of presentation. Of these, 45 per cent were culture positive with Salmonella Typhi being aetiological agent in 68 per cent followed by S. Paratyphi A in 32 per cent. During hospitalization, the average length of stay was 10 days with mean duration of defervescence 6.4 days. Based on antimicrobial susceptibility ceftriaxone was given to 28 patients with mean duration of treatment being six days. An additional antibiotic was needed in six patients due to clinical non-response. In OPD, 79 patients were prescribed cefixime and additional antibiotic was needed in five during follow up visit. Interpretation & conclusions: Based on our findings, ceftriaxone and cefixime seemed to be the first line of antibiotic treatment for typhoid fever. Despite susceptibility, clinical non-response was seen in around 10 per cent of the patients who needed combinations of antibiotics.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneChildChild, PreschoolCiprofloxacinDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSalmonella entericaSalmonella paratyphi ASalmonella typhiTyphoid FeverAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneCiprofloxacinAntibiotic usedays of therapyenteric feverSalmonellaTyphi

Identifiers

PMID31219092
PMCPMC6563751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.