Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31219082›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2019

Susceptibility profile, resistance mechanisms & efficacy ratios of fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin & colistin for carbapenem-resistant

Anushree Ulhas Amladi, Baby Abirami, S Manjula Devi, Thambu David Sudarsanam, Subramani Kandasamy, Nitin Kekre, Balaji Veeraraghavan, Rani Diana Sahni

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Carbapenem ResistantJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microbiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Global Threat of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  13. The burden of carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anushree Ulhas AmladiDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Baby AbiramiDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
S Manjula DeviDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Thambu David SudarsanamDepartment of Internal Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Subramani KandasamyDepartment of Intensive Care, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Nitin KekreDepartment of Urology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Balaji VeeraraghavanDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Rani Diana SahniDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Christian Medical College & Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives: The escalation in carbapenem resistance among Enterobacteriaceae has resulted in a lack of effective therapeutic alternatives. Older antimicrobials, fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin and colistin for urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) may be effective treatment options. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the utility of fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin and colistin in treating UTI caused by CRE and molecular characterization of the plasmid-mediated carbapenem resistance mechanisms. Methods: Consecutive, non-duplicate isolates of CR Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. from urine cultures were included (n=150). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined by E-test (fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin) and broth microdilution (colistin). Efficacy ratios were derived by dividing susceptibility breakpoints by observed MIC values of the drugs for the isolates. Isolates were screened for genes coding for carbapenemases using multiplex PCR. Fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin and colistin-resistant isolates were screened for plasmid-borne resistance genes fos A3, oqx AB and mcr-1, respectively using PCR. Results: Among E. coli, 98.9, 56 and 95 per cent isolates were susceptible to fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin and colistin, respectively, while 94 and 85 per cent of Klebsiella spp. were susceptible to fosfomycin and colistin, respectively. The efficacy ratios indicated fosfomycin as the drug of choice for UTI caused by CR E. coli and Klebsiella spp., followed by colistin. The bla Interpretation & conclusions: With increasing resistance against the current treatment options, older drugs may emerge as effective options. Molecular screening of resistant isolates is essential to prevent the spread of plasmid-borne resistance against these drugs.

Indexed as

Bacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeColistinEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsFosfomycinHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNitrofurantoinUrinary Tract InfectionsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseColistinFosfomycinNitrofurantoinCarbapenem-resistantcolistinEnterobacteriaceaefosfomycinnitrofurantointherapeutic efficacy

Identifiers

PMID31219082
PMCPMC6563748
OpenAlexW2948851625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.