Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31219050›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Feasibility of a New Cuffless Device for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement in Patients With Hypertension: Mixed Methods Study.

Paula Am Ogink, Jelske M de Jong, Mats Koeneman, Mariska Weenk, Lucien Jlpg Engelen, Harry van Goor, Tom H van de Belt, Sebastian Jh Bredie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paula Am Ogink *Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2052-0922
Jelske M de Jong *Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3612-1053
Mats KoenemanREshape Innovation Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7336-7135
Mariska WeenkDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0689-3669
Lucien Jlpg EngelenREshape Innovation Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8455-9367
Harry van GoorDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0323-4876
Tom H van de BeltREshape Innovation Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5401-8973
Sebastian Jh BredieDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6973-7540
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrequent home blood pressure (BP) measurements result in a better estimation of the true BP. However, traditional cuff-based BP measurements are troublesome for patients.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a cuffless device for ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurement.

methodsThis was a mixed method feasibility study in patients with hypertension. Performance of ambulatory SBPs with the device was analyzed quantitatively by intrauser reproducibility and comparability to a classic home BP monitor. Correct use by the patients was checked with video, and user-friendliness was assessed using a validated questionnaire, the System Usability Scale (SUS). Patient experiences were assessed using qualitative interviews.

resultsA total of 1020 SBP measurements were performed using the Checkme monitor in 11 patients with hypertension. Duplicate SBPs showed a high intrauser correlation (R=0.86, P<.001). SBPs measured by the Checkme monitor did not correlate well with those of the different home monitors (R=0.47, P=.007). However, the mean SBPs measured by the Checkme and home monitors over the 3-week follow-up were strongly correlated (R=0.75, P=.008). In addition, 36.4% (n=4) of the participants performed the Checkme measurements without any mistakes. The mean SUS score was 86.4 (SD 8.3). The most important facilitator was the ease of using the Checkme monitor. Most important barriers included the absence of diastolic BP and the incidental difficulties in obtaining an SBP result.

conclusionsGiven the good intrauser reproducibility, user-friendliness, and patient experience, all of which facilitate patients to perform frequent measurements, cuffless BP monitoring may change the way patients measure their BP at home in the context of ambulant hypertension management.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure DeterminationBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Resultsambulatory blood pressure monitoringcuffless blood pressure devicehome blood pressure monitoringhypertension

Identifiers

PMID31219050
PMCPMC6607776
OpenAlexW2943139500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.