Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31218802›Full record

ReviewHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019

What makes for effective, sustainable youth engagement in knowledge mobilization? A perspective for health services.

Eugenia Canas, Lisa Lachance, David Phipps, Cherrilyn Che Birchwood

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Young peoples' involvement in welfare service development-Is voice enough?-A thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Collaborating With Young People: Identifying the Barriers and Facilitators in Co-Designed Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Engaging young people within a collaborative knowledge mobilization network: Development and evaluation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  12. Research- and health-related youth advisory groups in Canada: An environmental scan with stakeholder interviews.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. What makes for effective, sustainable youth engagement in knowledge mobilization? A perspective for health services.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eugenia CanasWestern University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3979-7603
Lisa LachanceWisdom2Action, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
David PhippsYork University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cherrilyn Che BirchwoodUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAWestern University · CAYork University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung people who seek mental health treatment often also seek the services of non-profit organizations to support their well-being. Wisdom2Action (W2A) is a Canadian knowledge mobilization network that focuses on improving the mental health and well-being of children and youth in challenging contexts by increasing the use of evaluation, evidence and engagement in the youth-serving sector. Since 2013, W2A has engaged youth advisors (YAs) to provide input to W2A's Board, lead their own projects and co-design W2A activities.

objectiveIn fall 2017, the YAs, as well as adult Board members and W2A staff, collaborated in a participatory evaluation to better understand the experiences and impacts of youth engagement. This article describes insights derived through this process. DESIGN AND

participantsBoard, YAs and staff members participated in a reflective approach to informing, analysing and sharing the findings from this process. Individual interviews and review of documents, as well as iterative cycles of group analysis and synthesis, were conducted.

resultsBoth YAC members and W2A benefit from YAs' leadership and engagement. The YAs position themselves as members of the youth-serving sector, not merely recipients of its services; as such, their professional development aligns with the mandates of W2A and merits further investment, despite challenges in impact measurement.

conclusionThis article identifies challenges and facilitators of implementing an effective and sustainable youth advisory council model of engagement in the context of a pan-Canadian network. The mutual gains and areas of growth for youth, adults and the organization described can inform health services, as well as funders and advocates for youth well-being.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesAdolescentAdvisory CommitteesHumansInterviews as TopicPatient ParticipationQuality ImprovementSocial Justiceknowledge mobilizationmental health sectorservice deliveryyouthyouth engagement

Identifiers

PMID31218802
PMCPMC6803414
OpenAlexW2950799848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.