Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31218745›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2019

Potential prognostic factors for predicting the chemotherapeutic outcomes and prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Liqun Zhang, Jingdong Zhang, Yuanhe Wang, Qian Dong, Haiyan Piao, Qiwei Wang, Yang Zhou, Yang Ding

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liqun ZhangMedical Oncology Department of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Jingdong ZhangMedical Oncology Department of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0711-2764
Yuanhe WangMedical Oncology Department of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Qian DongMedical Oncology Department of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Haiyan PiaoMedical Oncology Department of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Qiwei WangMedical Oncology Department of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yang ZhouMedical Oncology Department of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yang DingMedical Oncology Department of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to explore whether pretreatment potential prognostic factors are related to chemotherapeutic outcomes and the prognosis of inpatients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) undergoing chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsData from 71 patients with mCRC were analyzed retrospectively. The relationship between the potential prognostic factors before first-line chemotherapy and the clinicopathological characteristics and chemotherapy response of the patients was calculated using Fisher's exact test and the chi-square test. The prognostic factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. We analyzed the subgroups using the Mann-Whitney U test.

resultsFour factors were eventually used as prognostic factors, namely the albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR), the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR), the prealbumin-to-globulin ratio (PGR), and the fibrinogen-to-prealbumin ratio (FPR); the cutoff values of the four potential prognostic factors were 1.40, 10.63, 5.44, and 18.49, respectively. The high AGR and PGR groups had a higher response rate than that of the low groups. Patients in the low FAR and FPR groups showed a higher objective response rate than the high FAR and FPR groups. Patients with low FPR were associated with a higher disease control rate than patients with high FPR. Higher progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in the high AGR and PGR and low FAR and FPR groups. The AGR, FAR, PGR, and FPR were considered reliable prognostic factors for PFS in a univariate analysis.

conclusionsThe prechemotherapy AGR, FAR, PGR, and FPR were good prognostic factors to predict the chemotherapy response and PFS in patients with mCRC.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFibrinogenFollow-Up StudiesGlobulinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSerum AlbuminSurvival RateBiomarkers, TumorFibrinogenGlobulinsSerum Albuminchemotherapy responsecolorectal cancerFARPGRprealbuminprealbumin to globulin

Identifiers

PMID31218745
PMCPMC6805281
OpenAlexW2951195056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.