ArticleJournal of anatomy2019
The anatomical society core embryology syllabus for undergraduate medicine.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Essential embryology for the Canadian pathologists' assistant.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Article
- A Core Head, Neck, and Neuroanatomy Syllabus for Physical Therapy Student Education.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- General skills amidst the details: alternative learning objectives and a framework of competencies for human anatomy.Advances in physiology education · 2024Article
- The need for creation of new learning outcomes in core curricula publications on differences in sex development and transgender anatomy.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
- Bygone binaries: Considering inclusion in anatomy education.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
- Considering a core curriculum for DSDs and gender identities-It is complicated.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
- Anatomy education for medical students in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland in 2019: A 20-year follow-up.Anatomical sciences education · 2022Article
- Extended reality visualization of medical museum specimens: Online presentation of conjoined twins curated by Dr. Jacob Henle between 1844-1852.Translational research in anatomy · 2022Article
- COVID-19 and anatomy: Stimulus and initial response.Journal of anatomy · 2020Review
- The Anatomical Society's Core Anatomy Syllabus for Dental Undergraduates.Journal of anatomy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A modified Delphi methodology was used to develop a consensus regarding a series of learning outcome statements to act as the foundation of an undergraduate medical core embryology syllabus. A Delphi panel was formed by recruiting stakeholders with experience in leading undergraduate teaching of medical students. The panel (n = 18), including anatomists, embryologists and practising clinicians, were nominated by members of Council and/or the Education Committee of the Anatomical Society. Following development of an a priori set of learning outcome statements (n = 62) by the authors, panel members were asked in the first of a two-stage process to 'accept', 'reject' or 'modify' each learning outcome, to propose additional outcomes if desired. In the second stage, the panel was asked to either accept or reject 16 statements which had either been modified, or had failed to reach consensus, during the first Delphi round. Overall, 61 of 62 learning outcome statements, each linked to examples of clinical conditions to provide context, achieved an 80% level of agreement following the modified Delphi process and were therefore deemed accepted for inclusion within the syllabus. The proposed syllabus allows for flexibility within individual curricula, while still prioritising and focusing on the core level of knowledge of embryological processes by presenting the essential elements to all newly qualified doctors, regardless of their subsequent chosen specialty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.