Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31218692›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2019

The anatomical society core embryology syllabus for undergraduate medicine.

Jane C Holland, Claire Smith, Marié O'Shea, Jane Stewart, Colin Ockleford, Gabrielle M Finn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jane C HollandDepartment of Anatomy, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8784-6169
Claire SmithBrighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Marié O'SheaRCSI Health Professions Education Centre, Dublin, Ireland.
Jane StewartClinical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Colin OcklefordLancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire, UK.
Gabrielle M FinnHealth Professions Education Unit, Hull York Medical School, Heslington, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0419-694X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A modified Delphi methodology was used to develop a consensus regarding a series of learning outcome statements to act as the foundation of an undergraduate medical core embryology syllabus. A Delphi panel was formed by recruiting stakeholders with experience in leading undergraduate teaching of medical students. The panel (n = 18), including anatomists, embryologists and practising clinicians, were nominated by members of Council and/or the Education Committee of the Anatomical Society. Following development of an a priori set of learning outcome statements (n = 62) by the authors, panel members were asked in the first of a two-stage process to 'accept', 'reject' or 'modify' each learning outcome, to propose additional outcomes if desired. In the second stage, the panel was asked to either accept or reject 16 statements which had either been modified, or had failed to reach consensus, during the first Delphi round. Overall, 61 of 62 learning outcome statements, each linked to examples of clinical conditions to provide context, achieved an 80% level of agreement following the modified Delphi process and were therefore deemed accepted for inclusion within the syllabus. The proposed syllabus allows for flexibility within individual curricula, while still prioritising and focusing on the core level of knowledge of embryological processes by presenting the essential elements to all newly qualified doctors, regardless of their subsequent chosen specialty.

Indexed as

CurriculumDelphi TechniqueEducation, Medical, UndergraduateEmbryologyHumansanatomy educationembryology educationintegrated curriculummedical educationsyllabusundergraduate education

Identifiers

PMID31218692
PMCPMC6742929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.