Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31218636›Full record

Trial reportNeurocritical care2020

White Matter Hyperintensities and Blood Pressure Lowering in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Secondary Analysis of the ATACH-2 Trial.

Andrea Morotti, Ashkan Shoamanesh, Jamary Oliveira-Filho, Frieder Schlunk, Javier M Romero, Michael Jessel, Alison Ayres, Anastasia Vashkevich, Kristin Schwab, Christy Cassarly and 6 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurocritical care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrea Morotti *Department of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Via Mondino 2, 27100, Pavia, Italy. andrea.morotti85@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6558-1155
Ashkan Shoamanesh *Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jamary Oliveira-FilhoJ. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Frieder SchlunkJ. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Javier M RomeroDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Michael JesselJ. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Alison AyresJ. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Anastasia VashkevichJ. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Kristin SchwabJ. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Christy CassarlyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Renee' Hebert MartinDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Steven M GreenbergJ. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Adnan I QureshiZeenat Qureshi Stroke Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Jonathan RosandJ. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Joshua N GoldsteinJ. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage 2 (ATACH-2) and the Neurological Emergencies Treatment Trials (NETT) Network Investigators
Harvard University · USBoston University · USFoundation Center · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

SCORE-IT: The CTA Spot Sign Score in Acute Cerebral HemorrhageR01NS073344 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSAND, JONATHAN · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (US) 5R01NS073344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is not clear whether subsets of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) benefit from intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering. We evaluated whether white matter hyperintensities (WMH) burden influences response to this therapy.

methodsRetrospective secondary analysis of the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage 2 trial. Patients were randomized to intensive (systolic BP target: 110-139 mmHg) versus standard (systolic BP target: 140-179 mmHg) BP treatment with intravenous nicardipine within 4.5 h from onset between May 2011 and September 2015. WMH were rated on magnetic resonance images (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences), defining moderate-severe WMH as total Fazekas scale score ≥ 3 (range 0-6). The main outcome was death or major disability at 90 days (modified Rankin scale ≥ 3). The secondary outcome was ICH expansion, defined as hematoma growth > 33% from baseline to follow-up CT scan. Predictors of the outcomes of interest were explored with multivariable logistic regression.

resultsA total of 195/1000 patients had MRI images available for analysis, of whom 161 (82.6%) had moderate-severe WMH. When compared to patients with none-mild WMH, those with moderate-severe WMH did not have an increased risk of death or major disability (adjusted relative risk: 1.83, 95% CI 0.71-4.69) or ICH expansion (adjusted relative risk: 1.14, 95% CI 0.38-3.37). WMH burden did not modify the effect of intensive BP treatment on outcome (all p for interaction ≥ 0.2).

conclusionThe majority of acute ICH patients have moderate-severe WMH, but advanced small vessel disease burden marked by WMH does not influence ICH-related outcomes or response to intensive BP reduction.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsCase-Control StudiesCerebral HemorrhageDisease ProgressionFemaleHematomaHumansLeukoaraiosisLogistic ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMortalityMultivariate AnalysisAntihypertensive AgentsNicardipineBlood pressureIntracerebral hemorrhageLeukoaraiosisSmall vessel diseaseStrokeWhite matter hyperintensities

Identifiers

PMID31218636
OpenAlexW2950644239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.