Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31218585›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019

The potential immunotoxicity of fine particulate matter based on SD rat spleen.

Ruijun Su, Xiaoting Jin, Liang Lyu, Junsheng Tian, Sajid Amin, Zhuoyu Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Study on Lung Injury Caused by Fine Particulate Matter and Intervention Effect ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  6. Tissue-Protective Effect of Erdosteine on Multiple-Organ Injuries Induced by Fine Particulate Matter.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  7. Micro- and Nanosized Substances Cause Different Autophagy-Related Responses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ruijun SuInstitute of Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Molecular Engineering of National Ministry of Education, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, 030006, China.
Xiaoting JinInstitutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, 030006, China.
Liang LyuInstitute of Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Molecular Engineering of National Ministry of Education, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, 030006, China.
Junsheng TianModern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, 030006, China.
Sajid AminInstitute of Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Molecular Engineering of National Ministry of Education, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, 030006, China.
Zhuoyu LiInstitute of Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Molecular Engineering of National Ministry of Education, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, 030006, China. lzy@sxu.edu.cn.
Shanxi University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 21707085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health risks have been closely related to increased exposure of fine particulate matter (PM

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAnimalsApoptosisAutophagyImmune SystemIn Situ Nick-End LabelingMaleOxidative StressParticulate MatterRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySeasonsSpleenAir PollutantsParticulate MatterApoptosisAutophagyERSOxidative stressPM2.5Spleen

Identifiers

PMID31218585
OpenAlexW2952883426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.