Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31218574›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2019

Types of Emotion Regulation and Their Associations with Gambling: A Cross-Sectional Study with Disordered and Non-problem Ecuadorian Gamblers.

María F Jara-Rizzo, Juan F Navas, Andrés Catena, José C Perales

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Characteristics and prediction of risky gambling behaviour study: A study protocol.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

María F Jara-RizzoDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Facultad de Psicología, Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Juan F NavasDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Facultad de Psicología, Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Andrés CatenaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Facultad de Psicología, Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.
José C PeralesDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Facultad de Psicología, Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain. jcesar@ugr.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5163-8811
Universidad de Granada · ES

Funding

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (Spain). Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) PSI2017-85488-PMinisterio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (Spain), Programa FPU FPU13/00669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This cross-sectional study was aimed at investigating the role of emotional regulation in regular gambling in a sample of 197 disordered and non-problem gamblers from Ecuador. Two proxies were used as measures of behavioral signs of generalized emotion dysregulation (UPPS-P emotion-driven impulsivity) and intentional emotion regulation strategies (ERQ), and their associations with gambling cognitions (as measured by the GRCS questionnaire), gambling behavior (SOGS), and comorbid alcohol and drug misuse (MultiCAGE), were explored. For analyses, impulsivity traits, including emotion-driven impulsivity scores, were used as inputs to predict dispositional variables (ERQ strategies and GRCS cognitions), and clinically relevant behavioral outputs, while controlling for gambling severity. Hypotheses were based on previously published work, although the analysis has been improved (using hierarchical linear mixed-effects modelling), and homogenized in covariate control, and decision threshold stringency. Results were as follows: (1) After controlling for relevant covariates, UPPS-P sensation seeking was positively associated with gambling cognitions, whereas positive urgency was positively associated with cognitive biases (interpretative bias, control illusion, and predictive control) but not with other gambling cognitions. (2) Among emotion regulation strategies, reappraisal, but not suppression, was associated with gambling cognitions. (3) Negative urgency was distinctively associated with suppression, but not with reappraisal. And (4), no impulsivity dimensions significantly predicted drug or alcohol misuse, although negative urgency fell just below the decision threshold. These results reinforce the importance of emotion regulation processes in the cognitive and behavioral manifestations of gambling. Most importantly, they suggest a dissociation between the role of model-free dysregulation of negative emotions (as measured by UPPS-P negative urgency), as a key contributor to gambling complication and general psychopathology; and the one of strategic emotion regulation, in fueling gambling-related cognitive distortions.

Indexed as

Impulsive BehaviorAdultBehavior, AddictiveComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingEcuadorFemaleGamblingHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleRewardSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultEmotion regulationGambling cognitionsGambling disorderImpulsivityIndividual differencesMixed-effects models

Identifiers

PMID31218574
OpenAlexW2953196162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.