Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31218529›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2019

Nivolumab in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: CheckMate 275 2-year global and Japanese patient population analyses.

Chikara Ohyama, Takahiro Kojima, Tsunenori Kondo, Yoshio Naya, Takamitsu Inoue, Yoshihiko Tomita, Masatoshi Eto, Shinichi Hisasue, Hirotsugu Uemura, Wataru Obara and 8 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Immunotherapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Optimizing management of advanced urothelial carcinoma: A review of emerging therapies and biomarker-driven patient selection.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Chikara OhyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan. coyama@cc-hirosaki-u.ac.jp.
Takahiro KojimaDepartment of Urology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, 305-8575, Japan.
Tsunenori KondoDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, 2-1-10 Nishiogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, 116-8567, Japan.
Yoshio NayaDepartment of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho, Hirokoji-agaru, Kawaramachi-dori, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Takamitsu InoueDepartment of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.
Yoshihiko TomitaDepartment of Urology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, 757 Ichibancho, Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan.
Masatoshi EtoDepartment of Urology, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Shinichi HisasueDepartment of Urology, Chiba-Nishi General Hospital, Kanagasaku 107-1, Matsudo City, Chiba, 270-2251, Japan.
Hirotsugu UemuraDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohnohigashi, Osakasayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Wataru ObaraDepartment of Urology, Iwate Medical University, 19-1 Uchimaru, Morioka, 020-8505, Japan.
Eiji KikuchiDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Padmanee SharmaDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Matthew D GalskyDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 10 East 102nd Street, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Arlene Siefker-RadtkeDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Gary GrossfeldBristol-Myers Squibb, 3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrence Township, NJ, 08648, USA.
Sandra ColletteBristol-Myers Squibb, 3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrence Township, NJ, 08648, USA.
Kyna GoodenBristol-Myers Squibb, 3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrence Township, NJ, 08648, USA.
Go KimuraDepartment of Urology, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNivolumab has demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable safety in the single-arm, phase II CheckMate 275 study in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic platinum-resistant urothelial carcinoma. We report updated results of the global population and a subanalysis of Japanese patients from this study.

methodsPatients received nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) confirmed by blinded independent review committee (BIRC) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) by BIRC and overall survival (OS). Safety was also reported. The minimum follow-up was 21 months.

resultsOverall, 270 patients were treated with nivolumab globally; 23 patients were Japanese. In the global and Japanese populations, respectively, ORR per BIRC was 20.4% and 21.7%; median PFS was 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-2.3) and 3.8 months (95% CI 1.9-7.2); and median OS was 8.6 (95% CI 6.1-11.3) and 21.0 months (95% CI 7.2-not reached). The most common any grade treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (18.1%) and diarrhea (12.2%) in the global population; the most common in the Japanese population were diarrhea (26.1%) and pyrexia (13.0%). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 61 (22.6%) and seven (30.4%) of the global and Japanese patients, respectively.

conclusionsNivolumab continues to show antitumor activity and survival in the global population of CheckMate 275. Meaningful clinical benefit was also observed in Japanese patients. No new safety signals were identified.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAsian PeopleDiarrheaDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNivolumabProgression-Free SurvivalQuality of LifeResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsTreatment OutcomeUrologic NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalNivolumabImmune checkpoint inhibitorImmunotherapyJapaneseMetastatic urothelial carcinomaNivolumab

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.