Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31218475›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2020

Levels, sources, and toxicity assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban topsoils of an intensively developing Western Siberian city.

Elizaveta Konstantinova, Tatiana Minkina, Svetlana Sushkova, Elena Antonenko, Alexandr Konstantinov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Soil contamination and human health: Part 1-preface.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizaveta KonstantinovaUniversity of Tyumen, Osipenko St. 2, Tyumen, Russian Federation, 625002. konstantliza@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9836-8721
Tatiana MinkinaSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation, 344006.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3022-0883
Svetlana SushkovaSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation, 344006.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3470-9627
Elena AntonenkoSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation, 344006.
Alexandr KonstantinovTyumen Industrial University, Tyumen, Russian Federation, 625000.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6950-2207

Funding

Russian Foundation for Basic Research 17-35-50055 mol_nr
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the levels, sources, spatial distribution, and toxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in urban soils of Tyumen, Russia. Observations of PAHs in cities of Western Siberia accomplished by a representative set of samples are very rare, even though it is one of the most urbanized parts of Russia. Therefore, it is important to estimate the status of PAHs in soils of urban environments representing vast Siberian regions. Tyumen, as one of the most intensively developing cities of Western Siberia, is a good object for such studies. Topsoil samples (0-10 cm) were collected from 241 sampling sites on a regular grid within Tyumen city limits. It was found that total concentration of 12 priority PAHs ranged from 33.4 to 2147.9 μg kg

Indexed as

AgricultureCitiesCluster AnalysisEnvironmental MonitoringIndustryPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPrincipal Component AnalysisSiberiaSoil PollutantsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsSoil PollutantsContaminationLand usePAHRisk assessmentSource identificationUrban soil

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.