Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31218459›Full record

ArticleFish physiology and biochemistry2019

Impacts of broadband sound on silver (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and bighead (H. nobilis) carp hearing thresholds determined using auditory evoked potential audiometry.

Andrew C Nissen, Brooke J Vetter, Loranzie S Rogers, Allen F Mensinger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effect of biological and anthropogenic sound on the auditory sensitivity of oyster toadfish, Opsanus tau.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew C NissenBiology Department, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, USA.
Brooke J VetterDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. bjvetter@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4658-7754
Loranzie S RogersBiology Department, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, USA.
Allen F MensingerBiology Department, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, USA.
University of Minnesota, Duluth · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

U.S. Geological Survey G16AC00390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive silver (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and bighead (H. nobilis) carp, collectively referred to as bigheaded carps, threaten aquatic ecosystems of the Upper Midwestern USA. Due to the extensive ecological impacts associated with these species, prevention of their further range expansion is the aim for fisheries management. Recent behavioral studies indicate bigheaded carps are deterred by acoustic barriers and exhibit negative phonotaxis in response to anthropogenic sound sources (≥ 150 dB re 1 μPa). However, the impact of long-term exposure to these sounds on the hearing capabilities of bigheaded carps has not been well documented. In this study, the auditory evoked potential (AEP) technique was used to determine auditory thresholds among bigheaded carps before and after exposure to high intensity (155.7 ± 4.7 dB re 1 μPa SPL

Indexed as

CarpsAnimalsAudiometryEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFish DiseasesHearing LossSoundAuditory evoked potentialBighead carpBroadband soundInvasive carpSilver carpTemporary threshold shift

Identifiers

PMID31218459
OpenAlexW2952657419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.