Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31218389›Full record

Observational studyKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2020

Clinical results and short-term survivorship of robotic-arm-assisted medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Francesco Zambianchi, Giorgio Franceschi, Elisa Rivi, Federico Banchelli, Andrea Marcovigi, Claudio Khabbazè, Fabio Catani

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. [Comparison of early effectiveness and safety between domestic robot-assisted and conventional simultaneous unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for bilateral anteromedial compartment osteoarthritis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Accuracy of ROSAJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Image-based robotics enhance precision and efficiency in lateral UKA: A comparative study of 135 UKAs.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A review.World journal of orthopedics · 2021
    Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francesco ZambianchiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Via del Pozzo, 71, 41124, Modena, Italy. francesco.zambianchi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7634-5692
Giorgio FranceschiDepartment of Knee Surgery, Policlinico Abano Terme, Abano Terme, PD, Italy.
Elisa RiviDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Via del Pozzo, 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
Federico BanchelliStatistics Unit, Department of Diagnostics, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Andrea MarcovigiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Via del Pozzo, 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
Claudio KhabbazèDepartment of Knee Surgery, Policlinico Abano Terme, Abano Terme, PD, Italy.
Fabio CataniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Via del Pozzo, 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this multicentre, retrospective, observational study was to determine the incidence of revision and clinical results of a large cohort of robotic-arm-assisted medial and lateral UKAs at short-term follow-up. It was hypothesized that patients who receive robotic-arm-assisted UKA will have high survivorship rates and satisfactory clinical results.

methodsBetween 2013 and 2016, 437 patients (470 knees) underwent robotic-arm-assisted medial and lateral UKAs at two centres. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Forgotten Joint Score 12 (FJS-12) and Short-Form Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales (SF-12) were administered to estimate patients' overall health status pre- and post-operatively. Results were dichotomized as 'excellent' and 'poor' if KOOS/FJS-12 were more than or equal to 90 and SF-12 was more or equal to 45. Associations between patients' demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes were investigated. Post-operative complications and pain persistence were recorded.

resultsFollowing exclusions and losses to follow-up, 338 medial and 67 lateral robotic-arm-assisted UKAs were assessed at a mean follow-up of 33.5 and 36.3 months, respectively. Three medial UKAs were revised, resulting in a survivorship of 99.0%. No lateral implants underwent revision (survivorship 100%). On average, significant improvement in all clinical scores was reported in both medial and lateral UKA patients. In medial UKA patients, male gender was associated with higher probability of better scores in overall KOOS, FJS-12 and in specific KOOS subscales. No other associations were reported between biometric parameters and outcome for either medial or lateral UKA.

conclusionsRobotic-assisted medial and lateral UKAs demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes and excellent survivorship at 3-year follow-up. Continued patient follow-up is needed to determine the long-term device performance and clinical satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, Level IV.

Indexed as

Knee ProsthesisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeOsteonecrosisRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeClinical outcomeRobotic armSurvivorshipUKA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.