Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31218369›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Corticomotor excitability reduction induced by experimental pain remains unaffected by performing a working memory task as compared to staying at rest.

Dennis B Larsen, Thomas Graven-Nielsen, Rogerio P Hirata, David Seminowicz, Siobhan Schabrun, Shellie A Boudreau

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Dennis B LarsenDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), SMI, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7 D3, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark.
Thomas Graven-NielsenDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), SMI, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7 D3, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark.
Rogerio P HirataSMI, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
David SeminowiczDepartment of Neural and Pain Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, 20201, USA.
Siobhan SchabrunNeuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Shellie A BoudreauDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), SMI, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7 D3, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark. sboudreau@hst.aau.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8310-2744
Aalborg University · DKNeuroscience Research Australia · AUUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental pain inhibits primary motor cortex (M1) excitability. Attenuating pain-related inhibition of M1 excitability may be useful during rehabilitation in individuals with pain. One strategy to attenuate M1 excitability is to influence prefrontal and premotor cortex activity. Working memory tasks, e.g. the two-back task (TBT), engage prefrontal and premotor cortices and may influence M1 excitability. We hypothesized that performing the TBT during pain would influence pain-related changes in M1 excitability. Participants (n = 28) received rigorous training in the TBT before baseline testing. Experimental pain was induced by injecting hypertonic saline into the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. Participants rated pain intensity on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) every second min until pain-resolved (PR) during the performance of the TBT (n = 14) or during REST (n = 14). In the TBT, letters were presented pseudo-randomly, and accuracy and reaction time to identified letters corresponding to letters shown two times back were recorded. M1 excitability was assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded at baseline, and at PR, PR + 10, PR + 20, and PR + 30 min. Four minutes after hypertonic saline injection, the pain NRS scores were higher in the TBT group than the REST group (p = 0.009). No time × group interaction was found for MEPs (p = 0.73), but a main effect of time (p < 0.0005) revealed a reduction of MEPs at PR up until PR + 30 (p < 0.008). The TBT accuracy improved at PR + 30 in both groups (p = 0.019). In conclusion, the pain-induced reduction in corticomotor excitability was unaffected by performing a working memory task, despite greater pain in the TBT group.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityPain MeasurementPain PerceptionPattern Recognition, VisualPrefrontal CortexPsychomotor PerformanceTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultAttentionMotor-evoked potentialsPain neuroplasticityPain perceptionTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID31218369
OpenAlexW2950220826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.