ArticleHuman reproduction open2019
You did not turn up… I did not realise I was invited…: understanding male attitudes towards engagement in fertility and reproductive health discussions.
Article in Human reproduction open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying potential factors influencing family-building perspectives in adults with SCD.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- From Test Offer to Urologic Follow-up: Acceptability of Semen Analysis in Male Infertility and Preconception Care.Cureus · 2026Review
- Lessons learned from longitudinal biomonitoring and birth cohort studies: informing the future of reproductive health research in Canada.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2026Article
- "What's wrong with me?": Women's perceptions of gendered infertility stigma.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2026Article
- Iranian men's Perception toward Preconception Care: A Qualitative Content Analysis.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2026Article
- 'She mustn't be the mother alone': motivators, barriers, and recommendations for men's engagement with reproductive research in South Africa.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- Infertility stigma and openness with others are related to depressive symptoms and meaning in life in men and women diagnosed with infertility.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Digital insights: Analyzing the reproductive intentions and influencing factors among urban women in China through online platforms.PloS one · 2025Article
- Male Attitudes towards Infertility: Results from a Global Questionnaire.The world journal of men's health · 2023Article
- Stimulating fertility awareness: the importance of getting the language right.Human reproduction open · 2023Article
- What does family building mean? A qualitative exploration and a new definition: a UK-based study.Reproductive health · 2022Article
- The ABC of reproductive intentions: a mixed-methods study exploring the spectrum of attitudes towards family building.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Perception of men's need for preconception care-A qualitative exploration among health care providers and community members.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Preconditions to parenthood: changes over time and generations.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2021Article
- A qualitative study of factors influencing male participation in fertility research.Reproductive health · 2020Article
- Acceptability of screening for pregnancy intention in general practice: a population survey of people of reproductive age.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Risky Business: Increasing Fertility Knowledge of Men in the General Public Using the Mobile Health ApplicationAmerican journal of men's healthArticle
- "My Wife's Healthcare Is my Healthcare": A Qualitative Study Exploring Family-Centered Strategies to Enhance Cervical Cancer Prevention in Northern Ghana.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionWhat are the underlying reasons for low male engagement in fertility and reproductive health discussions and decision-making? SUMMARY ANSWER: The perception of women's primacy in fertility and reproductive health limits the extent to which men believe their engagement is important. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Active participation of men in the process of informed decision-making regarding childbearing is beneficial for mother, father, and child. However, in research studies in these areas, little attention has been given to men. Additionally, there is poor engagement by men, as well as a dearth of information from, and on, the male perspective. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: In total, 35 semi-structured telephone and face-to-face interviews were conducted in an office setting with three groups: 13 lay women, 13 lay men, and 9 (2 male and 7 female) healthcare professionals. Interviews took place between October 2016 and February 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING
methodsParticipants were men and women of reproductive age from the general population and healthcare professionals who had completed an online fertility awareness survey and agreed to follow-up interviews. Interviews were audio recorded and lasted ~1 hour, during which participants were asked to provide their views on childbearing decision-making, and male and female representation in fertility and reproductive health. Data was transcribed verbatim and analysed qualitatively via framework analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Both men and women saw fertility as a woman's issue, but from different viewpoints. Women saw it from the perspective of societal stereotypes regarding male and female roles, whereas men tended to defer to the woman's primacy in reproductive decisions. Men generally wanted to be involved in childbearing discussions and improve their fertility knowledge. However, they felt they did not have a voice on the topic because discussions have traditionally focused on women. The notion that men are not expected to be interested and engaged thus becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Healthcare professionals agreed that fertility was perceived as the woman's domain, but also highlighted that poor male involvement is typically observed across healthcare needs and is not necessarily unique to fertility and reproductive health. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Due to the online recruitment method, there is a potential bias towards respondents of higher, rather than lower, socioeconomic status within the general population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsFertility tends to be seen as a private topic. Additional concerted effort by reproductive health researchers, charity organisations, educators, healthcare service providers, and policy makers is needed to proactively encourage male involvement in reproductive decision-making. This can be achieved through normalising and breaking taboos around the topic, male-friendly research study design approaches, male-inclusive reproductive healthcare services, implementation of health policies that recognise the needs of men, encouraging male research staff representation, and age-appropriate educational programmes on sexual and reproductive health, which include boys and adolescents from a young age. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Research funding was received from SPD Development Co. Ltd. B.G. and S.J. are employed by SPD Development Co. Ltd. None of the other authors have any conflict of interest related to the discussed topic. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.