Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31218230›Full record

Trial reportJournal of diabetes research2019

Do Nonsuicidal Severely Depressed Individuals with Diabetes Profit from Internet-Based Guided Self-Help? Secondary Analyses of a Pragmatic Randomized Trial.

Sandra Schlicker, Kiona K Weisel, Claudia Buntrock, Matthias Berking, Stephanie Nobis, Dirk Lehr, Harald Baumeister, Frank J Snoek, Heleen Riper, David D Ebert

Open access · goldAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of diabetes research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra SchlickerFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1340-2095
Kiona K WeiselFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
Claudia BuntrockFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
Matthias BerkingFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
Stephanie NobisGET.ON Institute GmbH, Germany.
Dirk LehrLeuphana University Lüneburg, Germany.
Harald BaumeisterUlm University, Germany.
Frank J SnoekVU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Heleen RiperVU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
David D EbertVU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DELeuphana University of Lüneburg · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2 are linked to higher prevalence and occurrences of depression. Internet-based depression- and diabetes-specific cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) can be effective in reducing depressive symptom severity and diabetes-related emotional distress. The aim of the study was to test whether disease-specific severity indicators moderate the treatment outcome in a 6-week minimally guided web-based self-help intervention on depression and diabetes (GET.ON Mood Enhancer Diabetes (GET.ON M.E.D.)) and to determine its effectiveness in a nonsuicidal severely depressed subgroup.

methodsRandomized controlled trial- (RCT-) based data (

resultsMajor depressive disorder diagnosis at the baseline (

conclusionDisease-specific severity indicators were not related to a differential effectiveness of guided self-help for depression and diabetes. Clinical meaningful effects were observed in nonsuicidal severely depressed individuals, who do not need to be excluded from web-based guided self-help. However, participants should be closely monitored and referred to other treatment modalities in case of nonresponse.

Indexed as

InternetSelf CareSelf-Help GroupsAdultAffectCognitive Behavioral TherapyComorbidityData Interpretation, StatisticalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHealth BehaviorHumansLanguageMajor Depressive DisorderMale

Identifiers

PMID31218230
PMCPMC6536948
OpenAlexW2945268119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.