ArticlePeerJ2019
Variations in gut bacterial communities of hooded crane (
Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metagenomics reveals gut microbial differences and ecological adaptation in plateau zokor (Eospalax baileyi) populations.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Impact of Season on Intestinal Bacterial Communities and Pathogenic Diversity in Two Captive Duck Species.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Intestinal Microbiota ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Comparative analysis of intestinal flora at different overwintering periods in wild relict gulls (Frontiers in microbiomes · 2023Article
- Host genetic background rather than diet-induced gut microbiota shifts of sympatric black-necked crane, common crane and bar-headed goose.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Comparative analysis of intestinal flora between rare wild red-crowned crane and white-naped crane.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Seasonal variations in the composition and diversity of gut microbiota in white-lipped deer (PeerJ · 2022Article
- Metagenomic analysis of gut microbiota and antibiotic-resistant genes inFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Flexibility and resilience of great tit (Parus major) gut microbiomes to changing diets.Animal microbiome · 2021Article
- Is Intestinal Bacterial Diversity Enhanced by Trans-Species Spread in the Mixed-Species Flock of Hooded Crane (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- First Report of Fecal Microflora of Wild Bar-Headed Goose in Tibet Plateau.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- Divergence in Gut Bacterial Community Structure between Male and Female Stag BeetlesAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Variations in gut bacterial communities between lesser white-fronted geese wintering at Caizi and Shengjin lakes in China.MicrobiologyOpen · 2020Article
- Significant Differences in the Gut Bacterial Communities of Hooded Crane (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Flexible Foraging Response of Wintering Hooded Cranes (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- A bird's-eye view of phylosymbiosis: weak signatures of phylosymbiosis among all 15 species of cranes.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicrobes have been recognized as important symbionts to regulate host life. The animal gut harbors abundance and diverse bacteria. Numerous internal and external factors influence intestinal bacterial communities, including diet, seasonal fluctuations and habitat sites. However, the factors that influence the gut bacterial communities of wild bird is poorly characterized.
methodsBy high-throughput sequencing and statistical analysis, we investigated the variations in gut bacterial communities of the hooded cranes at three wintering stages in Caizi (CZL) and Shengjin Lake (SJL), which are two shallow lakes in the middle and lower Yangtze River floodplain.
resultsOur results revealed significant differences in gut bacterial community structure and diversity among different sampling sites and wintering stages. Seasonal changes have a significant impact on the gut microbe composition of hooded cranes in the two lakes. ANOSIM analysis demonstrated that the samples in CZL had greater differences in the gut bacterial composition than that in SJL. Our data showed strong evidence that the host's gut filtering might be an important factor in shaping bacterial community according to mean nearest taxon distance (MNTD). The PICRUSt analysis showed that the predicted metagenomes associated with the gut microbiome were carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid metabolism and energy metabolism over the entire wintering period at the two lakes.
conclusionsThe results demonstrated that both seasonal changes and habitat sites have significant impact on the gut bacterial communities of hooded cranes. In addition, predictive function of gut microbes in hooded cranes varied over time. These results provide new insights into the gut microbial community of the cranes, which serves as a foundation for future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.