ArticleHealth psychology open
How to promote fruits, vegetables, and berries intake among patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care? A self-determination theory perspective.
Article in Health psychology open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Salutogenesis, nutritional status and eating behaviour: a systematic review.Public health nutrition · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Sense of Coherence and Adherence to Self-Care in People with Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Review
- Cross-Cultural Adaptability and Psychometric Validation of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) for Application on the Persian-Speaking Type 2 Diabetes Patients.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Fruit and vegetable consumption in diabetics patients: Effect of pender health promotion model (HPM) intervention.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
- Association between body esteem and sugar-sweetened beverage intake among Chinese undergraduate students: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Treatment self-regulation questionnaire across three self-care behaviours: An instrument validation study in Iranian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Nursing open · 2022Article
- Factors Related to Diabetes Self-Management Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Chinese Cross-Sectional Survey Based on Self-Determination Theory and Social Support Theory.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
- Factors influencing the consumption of fruits and vegetables in diabetic patients based on Pender's health promotion model.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Article
- Article
- From the challenge of assessing autonomy to the instruments used in practice: A scoping review.Porto biomedical journalArticle
- Healthy Eating as a New Way of Life: A Qualitative Study of Successful Long-Term Diet Change.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The results of this study showed the importance of autonomous motivation for healthy eating. Autonomous motivation and female gender were the determinants most strongly associated with fruits, vegetables, and berries intake among patients with type 2 diabetes. Other determinants of fruits, vegetables, and berries intake were high education, high social support, high age, and a strong sense of coherence. Autonomous motivation and self-care competence mediated the effect of perceived autonomy support from a physician on fruits, vegetables, and berries intake. Thus, physicians can promote patients' fruits, vegetables, and berries intake by supporting their autonomous motivation and self-care competence. The results are in line with self-determination theory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.