ArticleRoyal Society open science2019
Examining human-carnivore interactions using a socio-ecological framework: sympatric wild canids in India as a case study.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating Abundance of Crop-Foraging Primates in Anthropogenic Landscapes Using Camera Traps.American journal of primatology · 2025Article
- Acoustic Localisation as a Tool to Aid Monitoring of Golden Jackals (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Citizen science facilitates first ever genetic detection of wolf-dog hybridization in Indian savannahs.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Generalization of threats attributed to large carnivores in areas of high human-wildlife conflict.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022Article
- High striped hyena density suggests coexistence with humans in an agricultural landscape, Rajasthan.PloS one · 2022Article
- Examining human-carnivore interactions using a socio-ecological framework: sympatric wild canids in India as a case study.Royal Society open science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many carnivores inhabit human-dominated landscapes outside protected reserves. Spatially explicit assessments of carnivore distributions and livestock depredation patterns in human-use landscapes are crucial for minimizing negative interactions and fostering coexistence between people and predators. India harbours 23% of the world's carnivore species that share space with 1.3 billion people in approximately 2.3% of the global land area. We examined carnivore distributions and human-carnivore interactions in a multi-use forest landscape in central India. We focused on five sympatric carnivore species: Indian grey wolf
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.