Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31217997›Full record

ArticleOpen heart

Impact of aortic stiffness on myocardial ischaemia in non-obstructive coronary artery disease.

Mai Tone Lønnebakken, Ingeborg Eskerud, Terje Hjalmar Larsen, Helga Bergljot Midtbø, Marina Victorovna Kokorina, Eva Gerdts

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01853527 (Myocardial Ischemia in Non-obstructive Coronary Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01853527 completednot on this map

Myocardial Ischemia in Non-obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of BergenRan2013 to 2017Enrolled132ConditionsCoronary Atherosclerosis, Myocardial Ischemia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mai Tone LønnebakkenDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5600-8859
Ingeborg EskerudDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Terje Hjalmar LarsenDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Helga Bergljot MidtbøDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Marina Victorovna KokorinaDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Eva GerdtsDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Haukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: High aortic stiffness may reduce myocardial perfusion pressure and contribute to development of myocardial ischaemia. Whether high aortic stiffness is associated with myocardial ischaemia in patients with stable angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is less explored. Methods: Aortic stiffness was assessed as carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) by applanation tonometry in 125 patients (62±8 years, 58% women) with stable angina and non-obstructive CAD participating in the Myocardial Ischemia in Non-obstructive CAD project. PWV in the highest tertile (>8.7 m/s) was taken as higher aortic stiffness. Stress-induced myocardial ischaemia was detected as delayed myocardial contrast replenishment during stress echocardiography, and the number of left ventricular (LV) segments with delayed contrast replenishment as the extent of ischaemia. Results: Patients with higher aortic stiffness were older with higher LV mass index and lower prevalence of obesity (all p<0.05), while angina symptoms, sex, prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, smoking or LV ejection fraction did not differ between groups. Stress-induced myocardial ischaemia was more common (73% vs 42%, p=0.001) and the extent of ischaemia was larger (4±3 vs 2±3 LV segments, p=0.005) in patients with higher aortic stiffness. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, higher aortic stiffness was associated with stress-induced myocardial ischaemia independent of other known covariables (OR 4.74 (95% CI 1.51 to 14.93), p=0.008). Conclusions: In patients with stable angina and non-obstructive CAD, higher aortic stiffness was associated with stress-induced myocardial ischaemia. Consequently, assessment of aortic stiffness may add to the diagnostic evaluation in patients with non-obstructive CAD. Trial registration number: NCT01853527.

Indexed as

aortic stiffnessmyocardial ischemianon-obstructive coronary artery diseasestable angina

Identifiers

PMID31217997
PMCPMC6546180
OpenAlexW2943841053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.