Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31217993›Full record

ArticleOpen heart

Performance of a clinical/proteomic panel to predict obstructive peripheral artery disease in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

Cian P McCarthy, Shreya Shrestha, Nasrien Ibrahim, Roland R J van Kimmenade, Hanna K Gaggin, Renata Mukai, Craig Magaret, Grady Barnes, Rhonda Rhyne, Joseph M Garasic and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00842868 (The CASABLANCA Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00842868 completednot on this map

The CASABLANCA Study: Catheter Sampled Blood Archive in Cardiovascular Diseases. An Observational Biomarker Study

TypeobservationalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2008 to 2015Enrolled1,298ConditionsAtherosclerosis, Contrast Induced Nephropathy, Renal Impairment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Midkine-A novel player in cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Cian P McCarthyMedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4944-0034
Shreya ShresthaMedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nasrien IbrahimMedicine/Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Roland R J van KimmenadeCardiology, AZM, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hanna K GagginCardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Renata MukaiMedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Craig MagaretPrevencio, Kirkland, Washington, USA.
Grady BarnesPrevencio, Kirkland, Washington, USA.
Rhonda RhynePrevencio, Kirkland, Washington, USA.
Joseph M GarasicCardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
James L JanuzziCardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USPrevencia · SKMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at substantial risk of developing peripheral artery disease (PAD). We recently developed a clinical/proteomic panel to predict obstructive PAD. In this study, we compare the accuracy of this panel for the diagnosis of PAD in patients with and without DM. Methods and results: The HART PAD panel consists of one clinical variable (history of hypertension) and concentrations of six biomarkers (midkine, kidney injury molecule-1, interleukin-23, follicle-stimulating hormone, angiopoietin-1 and eotaxin-1). In a prospective cohort of 354 patients undergoing peripheral and/or coronary angiography, performance of this diagnostic panel to detect ≥50% stenosis in at least one peripheral vessel was assessed in patients with (n=94) and without DM (n=260). The model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.85 for obstructive PAD. At optimal cut-off, the model had 84% sensitivity, 75% specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of 84% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 75% for detection of PAD among patients with DM, similar as in those without DM. In those with DM, partitioning the model into five levels resulted in a PPV of 95% and NPV of 100% in the highest and lowest levels, respectively. Abnormal scores were associated with a shorter time to revascularisation during 4.3 years of follow-up. Conclusion: A clinical/biomarker model can predict with high accuracy the presence of PAD among patients with DM. Trial registration number: NCT00842868.

Indexed as

claudicationperipheral vascular diseaserisk factors

Identifiers

PMID31217993
PMCPMC6546197
OpenAlexW2945405374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.