ArticleEuropean journal for person centered healthcare2019
A randomized controlled trial protocol for an interdisciplinary evaluation of non-arthritic hip disease.
Article in European journal for person centered healthcare, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment decisions after interdisciplinary evaluation for nonarthritic hip pain: A randomized controlled trial.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2022Trial
- Relationships between physical therapy intervention and opioid use: A scoping review.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Associations Between Movement Impairments and Function, Treatment Recommendations, and Treatment Plans for People With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.Physical therapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNon-arthritic hip disease (NAHD) is a clinical condition often accompanied by painful movement. Current literature is lacking regarding how movement abnormalities are evaluated and treated in this population, which may be key to identifying which patients may respond to non-operative RATIONALE FOR STUDY
designA prospective, randomized controlled trial provides the ability to identify cause and effect of this new evaluation type.
methodsNinety-six adults with unilateral, NAHD presenting to a hip preservation clinic for initial evaluation will be randomized to receive either a standard evaluation with a surgeon or an interdisciplinary evaluation by a physical therapist and surgeon. Regardless of group, the surgeon conducts a standard-care examination. For participants in the interdisciplinary group, the physical therapist conducts an assessment of 6 postures and movements to identify asymmetrical, abnormal, or painful strategies. Treatment selection(s) and decisional conflict will be compared between groups after the evaluations. DISCUSSION: Persons with NAHD may experience considerable decisional conflict because of prolonged duration of symptoms and minimal evidence to compare operative and non-operative treatment for this population. The findings of this study have the potential to improve patient experience and produce more informed and supported treatment decisions for persons considering surgical treatment for NAHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31217989PMC6583806W2948540661What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.