ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2019
Biomechanical analysis of cervical range of motion and facet contact force after a novel artificial cervical disc replacement.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Facet joint loading after 1-, 2- and 3-level cervical disc arthroplasty: a comparison of spiked versus keeled baseplates.North American Spine Society journal · 2024Article
- Range of motion after 1, 2, and 3 level cervical disc arthroplasty.North American Spine Society journal · 2023Article
- Mechanical properties of an elastically deformable cervical spine implant.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- CT-guided ozone mixture injection in treatment of symptomatic lumbar facet synovial cysts.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2023Article
- Biomechanical properties of a novel cervical spine implant with elastic deformation: a cadaveric study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Single-level cervical disc arthroplasty in the spine with reversible kyphosis: A finite element study.JOR spine · 2022Article
- Does the sizing of current cervical disc arthroplasty systems match Chinese cervical anatomic dimensions?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Successful treatment of symptomatic facet joint synovial cysts using C-arm fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous aspiration: report of two cases.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Biomechanical Study of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Devices Using Finite Element Modeling.Journal of engineering and science in medical diagnostics and therapy · 2021Article
- Spontaneous Fusion After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of pain research · 2020Article
- Biomechanical effects of direction-changeable cage positions on lumbar spine: a finite element study.American journal of translational research · 2020Article
- Comparison of 10-year Outcomes of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Myelopathy and Radiculopathy.Orthopaedic surgery · 2019Article
- Biomechanical analysis of cervical range of motion and facet contact force after a novel artificial cervical disc replacement.American journal of translational research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An ideal implantation of artificial cervical disc replacement (ACDR) prosthesis should preserve the cervical biomechanics and maintain normal cervical biomechanics. In this study, we designed a novel prosthesis based on the physiological curvature of the cervical endplate, and conducted an in vitro test with cadaveric cervical specimens to study its effect on cervical range of motion (ROM) and facet contact force. Eighteen cadaveric cervical specimens (C2-C7) were evaluated with a 50 N follower load and a moment of ± 2.0 N-m. Testing conditions were as follows: control (group 1), C5-C6 ACDR with a novel prosthesis (group 2), C5-C6 ACDR with the Prestige LP prosthesis (group 3) and C5-C6 cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with cage internal fixation (group 4). The range of motion (ROM) of all segments and facet joint contact force were measured and analyzed. The results showed that there was no significant difference among the group 1, 2 and 3 in terms of ROM (P>0.05). The ROM of C5-C6 in the group 4 showed a significant decrease compared with the group 1, 2, and 3 (P<0.05). The group 2 had a similar facet joint force with the group 1, and there is no statistical difference among the group 1, 2 and 3 (P>0.05). The facet joint force of C5-C6 in the group 4 reduced significantly compared with the other groups (P<0.05). In conclusion, both novel cervical prosthesis and Prestige LP could better preserve the normal cervical ROM and maintain facet joint force than ACDF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31217880PMC6556652W2993743953What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.