Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31217859›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2019

The in vivo chondrogenesis of cartilage stem/progenitor cells from auricular cartilage and the perichondrium.

Xiaodie Zhang, Lin Qi, Yahong Chen, Zhezheng Xiong, Junjie Li, Peng Xu, Zongqin Pan, Huizhong Zhang, Zhuxin Chen, Ke Xue and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ChondrocytesFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiaodie ZhangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine 639 Zhi Zao Ju Road, Shanghai 200011, China.
Lin QiDepartment of Radiology, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University 221 West Yan-An Road, Shanghai 200040, China.
Yahong ChenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine 639 Zhi Zao Ju Road, Shanghai 200011, China.
Zhezheng XiongDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine 639 Zhi Zao Ju Road, Shanghai 200011, China.
Junjie LiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine 639 Zhi Zao Ju Road, Shanghai 200011, China.
Peng XuDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine 639 Zhi Zao Ju Road, Shanghai 200011, China.
Zongqin PanDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine 639 Zhi Zao Ju Road, Shanghai 200011, China.
Huizhong ZhangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine 639 Zhi Zao Ju Road, Shanghai 200011, China.
Zhuxin ChenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine 639 Zhi Zao Ju Road, Shanghai 200011, China.
Ke XueDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine 639 Zhi Zao Ju Road, Shanghai 200011, China.
Kai LiuDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine 639 Zhi Zao Ju Road, Shanghai 200011, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone marrow-derived stem cells are commonly studied for cartilage tissue engineering and regeneration medicine applications, but their ossification tendency and their limited capacity for chondrogenic differentiation depending on the donor age limit their clinical application. Cartilage stem/progenitor cells are ideal seeding cells, as cartilage stem/progenitor cells from auricular cartilage and the perichondrium have the inherent advantages of chondrogenesis capacity and an easy and nontraumatic harvesting process, displaying promise for applications. The identification and comparison of cartilage stem/progenitor cells from auricular cartilage and the perichondrium in vitro were explored in our previous study, but the in vivo chondrogenesis of these cells has not been fully examined. In the current study, we explored the ectopic chondrogenesis of cartilage stem progenitor/cells from auricular cartilage and the perichondrium after chondrogenic induction in vitro. Our results suggest that stem/progenitor cells from auricular cartilage exhibit significantly better chondrogenesis than those from the perichondrium in vivo, with upregulated chondrogenic genes and a stable cartilage phenotype, as well as good mechanical properties, indicating that stem/progenitor cells from auricular cartilage could be one type of ideal seeding cells for cartilage tissue engineering.

Indexed as

auricular cartilagecartilage stem/progenitor cellsChondrogenesisin vivoperichondrium

Identifiers

PMID31217859
PMCPMC6556626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.