Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31217671›Full record

ArticleCurrent directions in psychological science2019

Insights From Crossing Research Silos on Visual and Auditory Attention.

Karrie E Godwin, Lucy C Erickson, Rochelle S Newman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current directions in psychological science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karrie E GodwinDepartment of Educational Psychology, Kent State University.
Lucy C EricksonDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-5357-1697
Rochelle S NewmanDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland.

Funding

Toddlers listening and learning in noise: distraction vs. signal degradationR01HD081127 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI NEWMAN, ROCHELLE S · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD081127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many learning tasks that children encounter necessitate the ability to direct and sustain attention to key aspects of the environment while simultaneously tuning out irrelevant features. This is challenging for at least two reasons: (a) The ability to regulate and sustain attention follows a protracted developmental time course, and (b) children spend much of their time in environments not optimized for learning-homes and schools are often chaotic, cluttered, and noisy. Research on these issues is often siloed; that is, researchers tend to examine the relationship among attention, distraction, and learning in only the auditory or the visual domain, but not both together. We provide examples in which auditory and visual aspects of learning each have strong implications for the other. Research examining how visual information and auditory information are distracting can benefit from cross-fertilization. Integrating across research silos informs our understanding of attention and learning, yielding more efficacious guidance for caregivers, educators, developers, and policymakers.

Indexed as

auditory attentionclutterdistractionlearningnoiseselective sustained attentionvisual attention

Identifiers

PMID31217671
PMCPMC6583790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.