Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31217659›Full record

ArticleJournal of biogeography2019

Ancestral range reconstruction of remote oceanic island species of

N Iwanycki Ahlstrand, B Verstraete, G Hassemer, S Dunbar-Co, R Hoggard, H M Meudt, N Rønsted

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biogeography, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. PeerJ · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

N Iwanycki AhlstrandNatural History Museum of Denmark University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2060-777X
B VerstraeteNatural History Museum University of Oslo Oslo Norway.
G HassemerNatural History Museum of Denmark University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
S Dunbar-CoThe Nature Conservancy Kaunakakai Hawaii USA.
R HoggardDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Biology University of Oklahoma Tulsa Oklahoma USA.
H M MeudtMuseum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa Wellington New Zealand.
N RønstedNatural History Museum of Denmark University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKMuseum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa · NZThe Nature Conservancy · USUniversity of Oklahoma · USUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to resolve the phylogenetic placement of island taxa, reconstruct ancestral origins and resolve competing hypotheses of dispersal patterns and biogeographical histories for oceanic island endemic taxa within subgenus LOCATION: Juan Fernández Islands, the Auckland Islands, Lord Howe Island, New Amsterdam Island, New Zealand, Tasmania, Falkland Islands, Rapa Iti and the Hawaiian Islands. TAXON: Island endemics within

methodsWe use Bayesian phylogenetic and divergence time analyses and historical biogeographical analysis of molecular sequence data to infer the ancestral origins of the oceanic island species in

resultsTaxa within subgenus MAIN

conclusionsUsing molecular data to infer ancestral ranges for plants with uncertain taxonomic relationships can greatly improve our understanding of biogeographical histories and help elucidate origins, dispersal modes and routes in widespread lineages with complex distribution patterns such as

Indexed as

biogeographical range reconstructionbird dispersalisland taxalong‐distance dispersaloceanic islandsPlantago

Identifiers

PMID31217659
PMCPMC6559316
OpenAlexW2922133203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.