Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31217634›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of ecology2019

Testing the Distraction Hypothesis: Do extrafloral nectaries reduce ant-pollinator conflict?

Nora Villamil, Karina Boege, Graham N Stone

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Greasy Pole Syndrome inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nectar Secretion of Floral Buds ofFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Nora VillamilAshworth Laboratories, Institute of Evolutionary Biology University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6957-2248
Karina BoegeInstituto de Ecología, Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Ciudad de México Mexico.
Graham N StoneAshworth Laboratories, Institute of Evolutionary Biology University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK.
Centre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution · GBUniversidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México · MX

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ant guards protect plants from herbivores, but can also hinder pollination by damaging reproductive structures and/or repelling pollinators. Natural selection should favour the evolution of plant traits that deter ants from visiting flowers during anthesis, without waiving their defensive services. The Distraction Hypothesis posits that rewarding ants with extrafloral nectar could reduce their visitation of flowers, reducing ant-pollinator conflict while retaining protection of other structures.We characterised the proportion of flowers occupied by ants and the number of ants per flower in a Mexican ant-plant,

Indexed as

ant‐pollinator conflictDistraction Hypothesisextrafloral nectariesfitnessmyrmecophileTurnera velutina

Identifiers

PMID31217634
PMCPMC6559321
OpenAlexW2913733831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.