Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31217628›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2019

Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer: Evidence, Controversies, Consensus: Spectrum of Opinion of German Specialists on the 16th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference (Vienna 2019).

Michael Untch, Christoph Thomssen, Ingo Bauerfeind, Michael Braun, Sara Y Brucker, Ricardo Felberbaum, Friederike Hagemann, Renate Haidinger, Arnd Hönig, Jens Huober and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Concordance between results of inexpensive statistical models and multigene signatures in patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Conserving the axilla in breast cancer.Ecancermedicalscience · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Bioinformatics-Based Discovery ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Michael UntchKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, interdisziplinäres Brustzentrum, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany.
Christoph ThomssenKlinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Martin-Luther-Universität, Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany.
Ingo BauerfeindInterdisziplinäres Brustkrebszentrum, Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany.
Michael BraunInterdisziplinäres Brustzentrum, Frauenklinik, Rotkreuzklinikum München, München, Germany.
Sara Y BruckerUniversitäts-Frauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ricardo FelberbaumInterdisziplinäres Brustzentrum Kempten - Allgäu (IBZK-A), Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Kempten, Klinikverbund Kempten-Oberallgäu, Kempten, Germany.
Friederike HagemannBrustzentrum, Frauenklinik der Universität München (LMU), München, Germany.
Renate HaidingerBrustkrebs Deutschland e. V.
Arnd HönigBrustzentrum, Frauenklinik, Katholisches Klinikum Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Jens HuoberUniversitätsfrauenklinik Ulm, Brustzentrum, Ulm, Germany.
Christian JackischKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana-Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany.
Hans-Christian KolbergBrustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Marienhospital Bottrop gGmbH, Bottrop, Germany.
Cornelia Kolberg-LiedtkeCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany.
Thorsten KühnKlinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany.
Diana LüftnerMedizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Nicolai MaassBrustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Toralf ReimerBrustzentrum, Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Andreas SchneeweissSektionsleiter Gynäkologische Onkologie des Universitätsklinikum (UKHD), Fellow des Deutschen Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT), Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Eva Schumacher-WulfMamma Mia! Das Brustkrebsmagazin, Kronberg, Germany.
Florian SchützBrustzentrum, Sektion Senologie, UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marc ThillKlinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Rachel WuerstleinBrustzentrum, Frauenklinik der Universität München (LMU), München, Germany.
Peter A FaschingFrauenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Nadia HarbeckBrustzentrum, Frauenklinik der Universität München (LMU), München, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The results of the international St. Gallen Consensus Conference for the treatment of patients with primary breast cancer were discussed this year by a working group of leading breast cancer experts in view of the therapy recommendations for everyday clinical practice in Germany. Three of the breast cancer experts are also members of this year's St. Gallen panel. The comparison of the St. Gallen recommendations with the annually updated treatment recommendations of the AGO 2019 as well as the S3 guideline is useful, since the recommendations of the St. Gallen panel represent the opinions of experts from various countries and disciplines. The recommendations of the S3 guideline and AGO are based on evidence-based research of the literature. This year's 16th St. Gallen conference featured the motto "Magnitude of clinical benefit". In addition to the evidence-based data, each therapeutic decision must also undergo a benefit/risk assessment of the patient's individual situation and be discussed with the patient.

Indexed as

axillaearly breast cancerlocoregional therapyneoadjuvant treatmentSt. Gallen consensus 2019systemic therapy

Identifiers

PMID31217628
PMCPMC6570611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.