Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31217491›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Modeling sensitivity and uncertainties in platelet activation models applied on centrifugal pumps for extracorporeal life support.

Gabriel Fuchs, Niclas Berg, L Mikael Broman, Lisa Prahl Wittberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriel FuchsDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. gabriel.fuchs@ki.se.
Niclas BergLinné Flow Centre & BioMEx, KTH Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
L Mikael BromanDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4124-4581
Lisa Prahl WittbergLinné Flow Centre & BioMEx, KTH Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9976-8316
KTH Royal Institute of Technology · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SESundsvall Municipality · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two platelet activation models were studied with respect to uncertainties of model parameters and variables. The sensitivity was assessed using two direct/deterministic approaches as well as the statistical Monte Carlo method. The first two, are linear in character whereas the latter is non-linear. The platelet activation models were applied on platelets moving within an extracorporeal centrifugal blood pump. The phenomenological, Lagrangian stress- and time-based power law-based models under consideration, have experimentally calibrated parameters and the stress expressed in a scalar form. The sensitivity of the model with respect to model parameters and the expression of the scalar stress was examined focusing on a smaller group of platelets associated with an elevated risk of activation. The results showed a high disparity between the models in terms of platelet activation state, found to depend on the platelets' trajectory in the pump and the expression used for the scalar stress. Monte Carlo statistics was applied to the platelets at risk for activation and not to the entire platelet population. The method reveals the non-linear sensitivity of the activation models. The results imply that power-law based models have a restricted range of validity. The conclusions of this study apply to both platelet activation and hemolysis models.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationModels, BiologicalPlatelet ActivationUncertaintyCentrifugationMonte Carlo MethodStress, MechanicalTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31217491
PMCPMC6584555
OpenAlexW2952520117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.