ArticleScientific reports2019
Modeling sensitivity and uncertainties in platelet activation models applied on centrifugal pumps for extracorporeal life support.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Failure investigation of canned motor pump high temperature at yellow Teikoku Rotary Guardian as circulating pumps on the refining column.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- An Accelerated Thrombosis Model for Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations in Rotary Blood Pumps.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2022Article
- Platelet Function Is Associated With Dementia Risk in the Framingham Heart Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- Circulatory loop design and components introduce artifacts impacting in vitro evaluation of ventricular assist device thrombogenicity: A call for caution.Artificial organs · 2020Article
- Platelet activation via dynamic conformational changes of von Willebrand factor under shear.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two platelet activation models were studied with respect to uncertainties of model parameters and variables. The sensitivity was assessed using two direct/deterministic approaches as well as the statistical Monte Carlo method. The first two, are linear in character whereas the latter is non-linear. The platelet activation models were applied on platelets moving within an extracorporeal centrifugal blood pump. The phenomenological, Lagrangian stress- and time-based power law-based models under consideration, have experimentally calibrated parameters and the stress expressed in a scalar form. The sensitivity of the model with respect to model parameters and the expression of the scalar stress was examined focusing on a smaller group of platelets associated with an elevated risk of activation. The results showed a high disparity between the models in terms of platelet activation state, found to depend on the platelets' trajectory in the pump and the expression used for the scalar stress. Monte Carlo statistics was applied to the platelets at risk for activation and not to the entire platelet population. The method reveals the non-linear sensitivity of the activation models. The results imply that power-law based models have a restricted range of validity. The conclusions of this study apply to both platelet activation and hemolysis models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.