ArticleScientific reports2019
Relationship Analysis of Central Venous-to-arterial Carbon Dioxide Difference and Cardiac Index for Septic Shock.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Venous Blood Gas Analysis in Critical Care: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Can utilization of the venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference improve patient outcomes in cardiogenic shock? A narrative review.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
- Article
- Venoarterial Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide Difference: Let's Trend It!Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- Blood gas analysis as a surrogate for microhemodynamic monitoring in sepsis.World journal of emergency medicine · 2023Review
- Evaluation and prognostic value of Cv-aCOExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To analyze the relationship of the central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (p(cv-a)CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.